SoK: Yield Aggregators in DeFi
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Yield farming has become popular among cryptocurrency holders since the emergence of DeFi in 2020.
- The authors present a comprehensive framework for yield farming strategies with empirical analysis.
- They summarize the fundamentals of yield farming, focusing on protocols and tokens used by aggregators.
- Three example yield farming strategies are translated from sources of yield, followed by simulations of yield farming performance based on these strategies.
- Four major yield aggregators in the ecosystem -- Idle, Pickle, Harvest, and Yearn -- are compared along with brief introductions to others.
- The authors systematize their strategies and revenue models and conduct an empirical analysis using on-chain data from example vaults to identify plausible connections between data anomalies and historical events.
- Yield aggregators offer higher yields than traditional investments due to their ability to leverage various DeFi protocols simultaneously.
- However, they also come with risks such as smart contract vulnerabilities that can lead to loss of funds or impermanent loss due to market volatility.
- This SoK provides valuable insights into yield farming strategies which helps investors make informed decisions when participating in DeFi ecosystems.
Authors: Simon Cousaert, Jiahua Xu, Toshiko Matsui
Abstract: Yield farming has been an immensely popular activity for cryptocurrency holders since the explosion of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) in the summer of 2020. In this Systematization of Knowledge (SoK), we study a general framework for yield farming strategies with empirical analysis. First, we summarize the fundamentals of yield farming by focusing on the protocols and tokens used by aggregators. We then examine the sources of yield and translate those into three example yield farming strategies, followed by the simulations of yield farming performance, based on these strategies. We further compare four major yield aggregrators -- Idle, Pickle, Harvest and Yearn -- in the ecosystem, along with brief introductions of others. We systematize their strategies and revenue models, and conduct an empirical analysis with on-chain data from example vaults, to find a plausible connection between data anomalies and historical events. Finally, we discuss the benefits and risks of yield aggregators.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.