Does Persuasive Technology Make Smartphones More Addictive? -- An Empirical Study of Chinese University Students
AI-generated Key Points
- Computer hardware development has made Persuasive Technology more powerful and influential than ever.
- Persuasive Technology integrates with cutting-edge technologies such as Natural Language Processing, Big Data, and Machine Learning algorithms to make it increasingly intelligent and subtle.
- The dark sides of Persuasive Technology need to be reflected upon urgently.
- A study was conducted to examine the impact of persuasive technologies on young smartphone users aged 18 to 26 years old from Chinese universities.
- Among the participants, 84.70% spend over (or equal to) four hours per day on their smartphone, and 44.26% indicate that smartphones negatively affect their studies or professional life.
- Ten interviewees evaluated that they could reduce screen time by 37% if they could avoid all persuasive functions.
- This study provides empirical evidence that persuasive technologies increase users' screen time and contribute to addictive behaviors among young smartphone users.
- Some commonly used persuasive design principles could have negative long-term impacts on users.
- Toma Todo, Calendar; Zhihu, WeChat news subscription, Qidian online; Music apps, Games, Short video apps, Streaming service are among the top categories for usage among young smartphone users in China.
- Phrases associated with emotions such as "bored", "stress", "relax", "fun", “happy”,"isolated" were used by interviewees when asked about factors causing them to spend extended hours on their phones.
- The study had limitations due to its small sample size compared to the target group population size of 40 million.
- More questionnaires need to be distributed , and data collection methods need to be improved for more accurate screen times .
- Follow-up monitoring needs to be prolonged in order gain a deeper understanding of the long-term impacts of Persuasive Technology on users.
- There might be more negative effects besides addiction behaviors that require further investigation.
Authors: Xiaowei Chen
Abstract: With the development of computer hardware, computers with persuasion have become more powerful and influential than ever. The latest trends show that Persuasive Technology integrates with cutting-edge technologies, such as Natural Language Processing, Big Data, and Machine Learning algorithms. As persuasion is becoming increasingly intelligent and subtle, it is urgent to reflect on the dark sides of Persuasive Technology. The study aims to investigate one of Persuasive Technology's accusations, making smartphones more addictive to its users. The study uses questionnaires and in-depth interviews to examine the impact of persuasive technologies on young smartphone users. The participants of the study are 18 to 26 years old Chinese university students. Ten interviewees were sampled randomly from the survey results. Eight interviewees shared their smartphone screen time for three consecutive weeks after the interview. Among the 183 participants, 84.70% (n=155) spend over (or equal to) four hours per day on their smartphone, 44.26% (n=81) indicate that smartphones negatively affect their studies or professional life. Ten interviewees evaluated that they could reduce screen time by 37% if they could avoid all persuasive functions. Five out of eight interviewees reduced their screen time by 16.72% three weeks after the interviews by voluntarily turning off some persuasive functions on their smartphones. This study provides empirical evidence to argue that persuasive technologies increase users' screen time and contribute to the addictive behaviours of young smartphone users. Some commonly used persuasive design principles could have negative long term impacts on users. To sum up, the ethical problems that Human-computer interaction (HCI) designers face and users' neglected rights of acknowledgement were discussed.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.