Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.11184v5

This study examines the trends in scientific and technological progress over the past six decades. While theories of scientific and technological change suggest that prior knowledge enables future progress, recent studies have indicated a slowdown in major fields of science and technology. To investigate this further, the researchers analyze data from 45 million papers and 3.5 million patents across various disciplines. The findings reveal that both papers and patents are becoming less likely to break with the past and push science and technology in new directions. This pattern holds true across all fields, indicating a narrowing scope of existing knowledge informing contemporary discovery and invention. The decline in disruptiveness is linked to a decrease in the use of diverse, newer, and external sources of knowledge. Regression models confirm that relying on less diverse work, one's own work, or older work is negatively associated with disruptive activity. These results hold even after accounting for factors like average age and number of prior works produced by team members. The decline in disruption appears to be driven by scientists' and inventors' reliance on a narrower set of existing knowledge. The study suggests that this decline is not due to changes in citation practices or the quality of published work but represents a fundamental shift in science and technology itself. However, despite these declines, there remains a stable number of highly disruptive papers and patents being produced. The authors propose that changing practices of scientific and technological production may be responsible for this trend. They speculate that scientists and inventors may be allocating too much effort to writing rather than reading (and thinking), leading to declining use of prior knowledge. They suggest that reversing this trend would require a deeper understanding of the problem as well as rethinking strategies for organizing the production of science and technology in the future. Overall, while there are concerns about slowing innovative activity, the study offers reasons for optimism regarding future progress in science and technology if efforts are made to address these challenges effectively.

• - Recent studies indicate a slowdown in major fields of science and technology
• - Researchers analyze data from 45 million papers and 3.5 million patents
• - Both papers and patents are becoming less likely to break with the past and push science and technology in new directions
• - Decline in disruptiveness linked to a decrease in the use of diverse, newer, and external sources of knowledge
• - Relying on less diverse work, one's own work, or older work is negatively associated with disruptive activity
• - Decline in disruption driven by scientists' and inventors' reliance on a narrower set of existing knowledge
• - Changing practices of scientific and technological production may be responsible for the trend
• - Scientists and inventors may be allocating too much effort to writing rather than reading (and thinking)
• - Reversing this trend requires a deeper understanding of the problem and rethinking strategies for organizing the production of science and technology

Recent studies have shown that progress in science and technology is slowing down. Researchers looked at a lot of papers and patents to find this out. They found that both papers and patents are not as likely to come up with new ideas anymore. This is because people are using less diverse sources of knowledge and relying more on their own work or older work. Scientists and inventors need to understand this problem better and change how they do things in order to make progress again." Definitions: - Studies: When scientists look at something carefully to learn more about it. - Science: The study of the world around us, like how things work or why things happen. - Technology: Things that people invent to make life easier or better, like computers or phones. - Researchers: People who do studies and try to find out new information. - Papers: Writings by scientists about their discoveries or ideas. - Patents: A special document that gives someone the right to be the only one who can make or sell an invention for a certain amount of time. - Disruptiveness: When something is very different from what came before it, like a new idea that changes everything. - Diverse: When there are many different kinds of things or ideas. - Knowledge: What we know about something, like facts or information. - Reversing: Making something go back in the opposite direction.

Scientific and Technological Progress: Examining the Trends of the Past Six Decades

In recent years, there has been a growing concern among scientists and inventors that progress in science and technology is slowing down. To investigate this further, researchers have conducted a study to analyze data from 45 million papers and 3.5 million patents across various disciplines over the past six decades. The findings reveal that both papers and patents are becoming less likely to break with the past and push science and technology in new directions. This pattern holds true across all fields, indicating a narrowing scope of existing knowledge informing contemporary discovery and invention.

Decline in Disruptiveness Linked to Reliance on Narrower Set of Knowledge Sources

The decline in disruptiveness appears to be driven by scientists' and inventors' reliance on a narrower set of existing knowledge sources. Regression models confirm that relying on less diverse work, one's own work, or older work is negatively associated with disruptive activity. These results hold even after accounting for factors like average age and number of prior works produced by team members.

Possible Causes for Decline

The study suggests that this decline is not due to changes in citation practices or the quality of published work but represents a fundamental shift in science and technology itself. The authors propose that changing practices of scientific production may be responsible for this trend; they speculate that scientists may be allocating too much effort to writing rather than reading (and thinking), leading to declining use of prior knowledge sources when producing new research or inventions.

Reversing the Trend

To reverse this trend, deeper understanding as well as rethinking strategies for organizing scientific production will be necessary going forward. Despite these declines, however, there remains a stable number of highly disruptive papers being produced which gives reason for optimism regarding future progress in science and technology if efforts are made effectively address these challenges moving forward.