The decline of disruptive science and technology
AI-generated Key Points
- Recent studies indicate a slowdown in major fields of science and technology
- Researchers analyze data from 45 million papers and 3.5 million patents
- Both papers and patents are becoming less likely to break with the past and push science and technology in new directions
- Decline in disruptiveness linked to a decrease in the use of diverse, newer, and external sources of knowledge
- Relying on less diverse work, one's own work, or older work is negatively associated with disruptive activity
- Decline in disruption driven by scientists' and inventors' reliance on a narrower set of existing knowledge
- Changing practices of scientific and technological production may be responsible for the trend
- Scientists and inventors may be allocating too much effort to writing rather than reading (and thinking)
- Reversing this trend requires a deeper understanding of the problem and rethinking strategies for organizing the production of science and technology
Authors: Michael Park, Erin Leahey, Russell Funk
Abstract: Theories of scientific and technological change view discovery and invention as endogenous processes, wherein prior accumulated knowledge enables future progress by allowing researchers to, in Newton's words, "stand on the shoulders of giants". Recent decades have witnessed exponential growth in the volume of new scientific and technological knowledge, thereby creating conditions that should be ripe for major advances. Yet contrary to this view, studies suggest that progress is slowing in several major fields of science and technology. Here, we analyze these claims at scale across 6 decades, using data on 45 million papers and 3.5 million patents from 6 large-scale datasets. We find that papers and patents are increasingly less likely to break with the past in ways that push science and technology in new directions, a pattern that holds universally across fields. Subsequently, we link this decline in disruptiveness to a narrowing in the use of prior knowledge, allowing us to reconcile the patterns we observe with the "shoulders of giants" view. We find that the observed declines are unlikely to be driven by changes in the quality of published science, citation practices, or field-specific factors. Overall, our results suggest that slowing rates of disruption may reflect a fundamental shift in the nature of science and technology.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.