Modeling User Behaviour in Research Paper Recommendation System

AI-generated keywords: Research paper recommendation systems

AI-generated Key Points

  • Shift towards modeling user intention in research paper recommendation systems
  • Various approaches to effectively capture user intention:
  • Incremental dataset collection for user preferences like publication date and publishing authority
  • User profiles based on topics provided by users, updated with new topics
  • Deep learning-based system using implicit and explicit feedback for user profiles
  • Representation of user profiles using Dynamic Normalized Tree of Concepts (DNTC)
  • Content-based recommendation approach using weighted keyphrases from tagged papers
  • Hybrid article recommendation system in social networks utilizing metadata like title, abstract, published journal, and year
  • Importance of capturing user intention for accurate and personalized recommendations tailored to individual users' needs and interests
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Arpita Chaudhuri, Debasis Samanta, Monalisa Sarma

23 pages
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: User intention which often changes dynamically is considered to be an important factor for modeling users in the design of recommendation systems. Recent studies are starting to focus on predicting user intention (what users want) beyond user preference (what users like). In this work, a user intention model is proposed based on deep sequential topic analysis. The model predicts a user's intention in terms of the topic of interest. The Hybrid Topic Model (HTM) comprising Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Word2Vec is proposed to derive the topic of interest of users and the history of preferences. HTM finds the true topics of papers estimating word-topic distribution which includes syntactic and semantic correlations among words. Next, to model user intention, a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) based sequential deep learning model is proposed. This model takes into account temporal context, namely the time difference between clicks of two consecutive papers seen by a user. Extensive experiments with the real-world research paper dataset indicate that the proposed approach significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Further, the proposed approach introduces a new road map to model a user activity suitable for the design of a research paper recommendation system.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.07831v1

, , , , In the realm of research paper recommendation systems, there has been a shift towards modeling user intention rather than solely focusing on user preferences. This shift is driven by the recognition that <kw>user intention</kw> is dynamic and plays a crucial role in enhancing the accuracy of recommendations. Various approaches have been proposed to capture <kw>user intention</kw> effectively. Dhanda and Verma introduced a recommender system that leverages incremental dataset collection to gather user preferences such as publication date and publishing authority from liked papers. These preferences are then utilized to recommend papers based on similarity matching with candidate papers. Hong et al. defined <kw>user profiles</kw> based on topics provided by users, which are updated with new topics. They used cosine similarity to identify related papers for recommendation. Hassan proposed a deep learning-based research paper recommendation system that creates <kw>user profiles</kw> using both implicit and explicit feedback. User preferences are extracted from preferred articles, while short-term interests are inferred from transaction logs. Recommendations are made using cosine similarity between candidate papers and those stored in the user profile. Alshaikh introduced a unique approach to representing <kw>user profiles</kw> using Dynamic Normalized Tree of Concepts (DNTC). The DNTC captures semantic relationships between concepts extracted from reading papers, reflecting users' short-term interests. Recommendations are generated based on similarities with these short-term interests. Ferrara et al. developed a content-based recommendation approach where weighted keyphrases from tagged papers were used to construct <kw>user profiles</kw>. Similarity matching was then employed to recommend papers aligned with these profiles. Sun et al. suggested a hybrid article recommendation system in social networks, utilizing metadata such as title, abstract, published journal, and year to define <kw>user profiles</kw>. Connectivity graphs were used to establish relations between users and articles, with recommendations generated through Random Walk Restart (RWR) method. Gautam et al. collected personal information explicitly from users' academic data to build their profiles using tags or keywords associated with their academic work. Overall, these diverse approaches highlight the importance of capturing <kw>user intention</kw> in research paper recommendation systems for more accurate and personalized recommendations tailored to individual users' needs and interests.
Created on 01 May. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.