Federated Learning Versus Classical Machine Learning: A Convergence Comparison

AI-generated keywords: Federated Learning Privacy Concerns Machine Learning Models Security Efficiency

AI-generated Key Points

Federated learning is a promising approach to address privacy concerns in machine learning models
Traditional centralized data training poses significant privacy threats
Federated learning allows participants to train local models on their own data without compromising privacy
Research gaps exist in federated learning, including participant heterogeneity, clustering techniques, dynamic participant-cluster associations, and hierarchical architectures
Challenges in machine-federated learning include data isolation and enhancing data safety and privacy
Various methods have been proposed to improve the security of federated learning systems such as differential privacy mechanisms and encryption techniques
Federated learning achieves higher convergence within limited communication rounds while maintaining participants' anonymity compared to classical machine learning
Researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of federated learning in preserving privacy while achieving comparable performance to traditional centralized training methods using publicly available datasets like logistic-regression-MNIST and image-classification-CIFAR-10 datasets
Further research is needed to explore advanced techniques for enhancing the security and efficiency of federated learning systems

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Muhammad Asad, Ahmed Moustafa, Takayuki Ito

arXiv: 2107.10976v1 - DOI (cs.LG)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In the past few decades, machine learning has revolutionized data processing for large scale applications. Simultaneously, increasing privacy threats in trending applications led to the redesign of classical data training models. In particular, classical machine learning involves centralized data training, where the data is gathered, and the entire training process executes at the central server. Despite significant convergence, this training involves several privacy threats on participants' data when shared with the central cloud server. To this end, federated learning has achieved significant importance over distributed data training. In particular, the federated learning allows participants to collaboratively train the local models on local data without revealing their sensitive information to the central cloud server. In this paper, we perform a convergence comparison between classical machine learning and federated learning on two publicly available datasets, namely, logistic-regression-MNIST dataset and image-classification-CIFAR-10 dataset. The simulation results demonstrate that federated learning achieves higher convergence within limited communication rounds while maintaining participants' anonymity. We hope that this research will show the benefits and help federated learning to be implemented widely.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.10976v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

Federated learning has emerged as a promising approach to address privacy concerns in machine learning models. Traditional centralized data training poses significant privacy threats when sensitive information is shared with a central server. However, federated learning allows participants to collaboratively train local models on their own data without compromising their privacy. Despite its potential benefits, federated learning has not been widely implemented yet and research gaps still exist. These include participant heterogeneity, clustering techniques, dynamic participant-cluster associations, and hierarchical architectures. Existing literature primarily focuses on privacy-preserving algorithms for both centralized and distributed learning. Challenges in machine-federated learning include data isolation and techniques for enhancing data safety and privacy. Researchers have proposed various methods to improve the security of federated learning systems such as differential privacy mechanisms and encryption techniques. Moreover, the comparison between classical machine learning and federated learning reveals that the latter achieves higher convergence within limited communication rounds while maintaining participants' anonymity. By conducting convergence comparisons on publicly available datasets like logistic-regression-MNIST and image-classification-CIFAR-10 datasets, researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of federated learning in preserving privacy while achieving comparable performance to traditional centralized training methods. In conclusion, further research is needed to explore advanced techniques for enhancing the security and efficiency of federated learning systems. By addressing these challenges and refining existing methodologies, federated learning can be more widely adopted across various applications to ensure data privacy protection while maximizing model performance.

- Federated learning is a promising approach to address privacy concerns in machine learning models
- Traditional centralized data training poses significant privacy threats
- Federated learning allows participants to train local models on their own data without compromising privacy
- Research gaps exist in federated learning, including participant heterogeneity, clustering techniques, dynamic participant-cluster associations, and hierarchical architectures
- Challenges in machine-federated learning include data isolation and enhancing data safety and privacy
- Various methods have been proposed to improve the security of federated learning systems such as differential privacy mechanisms and encryption techniques
- Federated learning achieves higher convergence within limited communication rounds while maintaining participants' anonymity compared to classical machine learning
- Researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of federated learning in preserving privacy while achieving comparable performance to traditional centralized training methods using publicly available datasets like logistic-regression-MNIST and image-classification-CIFAR-10 datasets
- Further research is needed to explore advanced techniques for enhancing the security and efficiency of federated learning systems

Summary1. Federated learning is a way to keep data private when training computer models. 2. Sharing data in one place can be risky for privacy. 3. With federated learning, people can train their own models without sharing their data. 4. There are still things to learn about federated learning, like how different participants work together and ways to organize them. 5. Challenges include keeping data safe and improving privacy in machine learning. Definitions- Federated learning: A method where multiple devices or parties collaborate in training a shared machine learning model without sharing their data directly. - Privacy: The right to keep personal information and activities secret from others. - Participants: People or entities involved in an activity or process. - Machine learning: A type of artificial intelligence that enables computers to learn from data and improve over time. - Security: Measures taken to protect against threats or dangers.

Federated learning has emerged as a promising approach to address privacy concerns in machine learning models. In traditional centralized data training, sensitive information is shared with a central server, posing significant privacy threats. However, federated learning allows participants to collaboratively train local models on their own data without compromising their privacy. What is Federated Learning? Federated learning is a decentralized machine learning technique that enables multiple parties to jointly train a model while keeping their data private. It involves the use of distributed computing systems where each participant trains their own local model using their private data and then shares only the updated model parameters with a central server or aggregator. Why is it Important? With the increasing amount of personal data being collected and used for various purposes, there are growing concerns about privacy violations. Traditional centralized machine learning methods require all data to be collected and stored in one location, making it vulnerable to security breaches and misuse of personal information. Federated learning addresses these concerns by allowing individuals or organizations to retain control over their own data while still benefiting from collaborative model training. Research Gaps in Federated Learning Despite its potential benefits, federated learning has not been widely implemented yet and research gaps still exist. These include participant heterogeneity, clustering techniques, dynamic participant-cluster associations, and hierarchical architectures. Participant Heterogeneity: In federated learning systems, participants may have different types of devices (e.g., smartphones vs laptops), different network conditions (e.g., high-speed internet vs low-speed cellular networks), and varying levels of computational power. This heterogeneity can affect the performance of the trained models and needs further exploration. Clustering Techniques: Clustering techniques are used in federated learning to group participants based on similarities in their datasets or device characteristics. However, current methods do not consider dynamic changes in cluster associations over time which can impact model performance. Dynamic Participant-Cluster Associations: As participants join or leave the system at different times, the cluster associations may need to be updated dynamically. This requires efficient algorithms that can handle frequent changes in participant-cluster associations. Hierarchical Architectures: Hierarchical architectures involve multiple levels of aggregation where local models are first trained within clusters and then aggregated at a higher level. However, there is a lack of research on how to optimize these hierarchical structures for federated learning systems. Privacy-Preserving Algorithms Existing literature primarily focuses on privacy-preserving algorithms for both centralized and distributed learning. These techniques aim to protect sensitive data from being exposed during model training or inference. Some commonly used methods include differential privacy mechanisms and encryption techniques. Challenges in Machine-Federated Learning One of the main challenges in federated learning is data isolation, where participants' data remains isolated on their devices without being shared with other parties or the central server. This makes it difficult to ensure that all participants have access to sufficient and diverse data for effective model training. Another challenge is enhancing data safety and privacy while maintaining model performance. As more advanced machine learning models are developed, they require larger amounts of data for training which can increase the risk of exposing sensitive information. Comparison with Classical Machine Learning Comparing classical machine learning with federated learning reveals that the latter achieves higher convergence within limited communication rounds while maintaining participants' anonymity. By conducting convergence comparisons on publicly available datasets like logistic-regression-MNIST and image-classification-CIFAR-10 datasets, researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of federated learning in preserving privacy while achieving comparable performance to traditional centralized training methods. Future Directions In conclusion, further research is needed to explore advanced techniques for enhancing the security and efficiency of federated learning systems. By addressing challenges such as participant heterogeneity, dynamic participant-cluster associations, and hierarchical architectures, we can improve the overall performance and adoption of federated learning across various applications. Moreover, there is a need for standardized evaluation metrics for comparing different federated learning methods. This will help researchers and practitioners to better understand the strengths and limitations of different approaches. Additionally, more studies are needed to investigate the trade-offs between privacy protection and model accuracy in federated learning. By finding a balance between these two factors, we can ensure that sensitive data remains protected while still achieving high-performing models. Conclusion Federated learning has emerged as a promising solution for addressing privacy concerns in machine learning models. It allows participants to collaboratively train local models without compromising their privacy, making it suitable for various applications where data privacy is crucial. However, there are still research gaps that need to be addressed to fully realize the potential of federated learning. By refining existing methodologies and exploring advanced techniques, we can enhance the security and efficiency of federated learning systems and promote its wider adoption in real-world scenarios.

Created on 13 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.