Open-Ended Learning Leads to Generally Capable Agents

AI-generated keywords: Agents Training Universe of Tasks Iterative Improvement Generalization

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors present a novel approach to training agents for diverse tasks in a challenging environment
  • Agents are trained in a multi-agent environment with competitive, cooperative, and independent games
  • Proposed iterative improvement between generations of agents instead of maximizing a singular objective
  • Open-ended learning process with dynamically changing training task distributions and objectives
  • Agent shows remarkable capabilities, scoring rewards in every humanly solvable evaluation level
  • Zero-shot generalization demonstrated in tasks like Hide and Seek, Capture the Flag, and Tag
  • Emergent heuristic behaviors identified such as trial-and-error experimentation, simple tool use, option switching, and cooperation
  • General capabilities enable larger-scale transfer of behavior through cheap fine-tuning
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Open-Ended Learning Team, Adam Stooke, Anuj Mahajan, Catarina Barros, Charlie Deck, Jakob Bauer, Jakub Sygnowski, Maja Trebacz, Max Jaderberg, Michael Mathieu, Nat McAleese, Nathalie Bradley-Schmieg, Nathaniel Wong, Nicolas Porcel, Roberta Raileanu, Steph Hughes-Fitt, Valentin Dalibard, Wojciech Marian Czarnecki

Abstract: In this work we create agents that can perform well beyond a single, individual task, that exhibit much wider generalisation of behaviour to a massive, rich space of challenges. We define a universe of tasks within an environment domain and demonstrate the ability to train agents that are generally capable across this vast space and beyond. The environment is natively multi-agent, spanning the continuum of competitive, cooperative, and independent games, which are situated within procedurally generated physical 3D worlds. The resulting space is exceptionally diverse in terms of the challenges posed to agents, and as such, even measuring the learning progress of an agent is an open research problem. We propose an iterative notion of improvement between successive generations of agents, rather than seeking to maximise a singular objective, allowing us to quantify progress despite tasks being incomparable in terms of achievable rewards. We show that through constructing an open-ended learning process, which dynamically changes the training task distributions and training objectives such that the agent never stops learning, we achieve consistent learning of new behaviours. The resulting agent is able to score reward in every one of our humanly solvable evaluation levels, with behaviour generalising to many held-out points in the universe of tasks. Examples of this zero-shot generalisation include good performance on Hide and Seek, Capture the Flag, and Tag. Through analysis and hand-authored probe tasks we characterise the behaviour of our agent, and find interesting emergent heuristic behaviours such as trial-and-error experimentation, simple tool use, option switching, and cooperation. Finally, we demonstrate that the general capabilities of this agent could unlock larger scale transfer of behaviour through cheap finetuning.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.12808v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this work, the authors present a novel approach to training agents that can perform well across a wide range of tasks and exhibit generalization of behavior in a diverse and challenging environment. They define a universe of tasks within a multi-agent environment domain, which includes competitive, cooperative, and independent games situated in procedurally generated 3D worlds. The challenges posed to the agents in this environment are exceptionally diverse, making it difficult to measure their learning progress. To address this challenge, the authors propose an iterative notion of improvement between successive generations of agents instead of maximizing a singular objective. This allows them to quantify progress even when tasks have incomparable rewards. They demonstrate that by constructing an open-ended learning process that dynamically changes the training task distributions and objectives, they achieve consistent learning of new behaviors. The resulting agent shows remarkable capabilities, being able to score rewards in every humanly solvable evaluation level and generalize its behavior to many held-out points in the universe of tasks. Notably, the agent demonstrates zero-shot generalization in tasks such as Hide and Seek, Capture the Flag, and Tag. Through analysis and hand-authored probe tasks, the authors characterize the behavior of their agent and identify interesting emergent heuristic behaviors such as trial-and-error experimentation, simple tool use, option switching, and cooperation. Finally, they demonstrate that the general capabilities of their agent could enable larger-scale transfer of behavior through cheap fine-tuning. Overall, this work presents an innovative approach to training agents that can perform well across a wide range of tasks while exhibiting generalization in complex environments with remarkable capabilities such as zero-shot generalization for various game types like Hide and Seek or Capture The Flag. Furthermore it is capable of identifying emergent heuristic behaviors like trial-and-error experimentation or simple tool use which enables larger scale transfer through cheap fine tuning.
Created on 01 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.