A Theory of Consciousness from a Theoretical Computer Science Perspective 2: Insights from the Conscious Turing Machine
AI-generated Key Points
- The pursuit of understanding consciousness has shifted from philosophy and theology to the scientific community.
- Theoretical computer science offers a unique perspective on consciousness.
- The authors formalize a modified version of the Global Workspace Theory (GWT) of consciousness using TCS principles.
- They introduce the Conscious Turing Machine (CTM), a simple computational model of consciousness that defines consciousness and related notions within its framework.
- CTM is not intended to be a complex model of cognition or the brain but rather a mathematical definition that provides insight into understanding consciousness.
- Examples related to vision, dreams, free will, and altered states of consciousness are explored through CTM.
- Historical synergy between theoretical computer science and neuroscience is highlighted by Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts' formal neuron model that led to the mathematical formalization of neural nets and subsequent deep learning algorithms.
- CTM's basic structure includes short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) processors, up-tree competition, down-tree broadcast, chunks, conscious content, conscious awareness, stream of consciousness links, unconscious communication input/output maps for sensors/actuators.
- Brainish is introduced as the CTM's multi-model inner language along with gists and chunks.
- The probabilistic up-tree competition function and coin-flip neuron are discussed in detail.
- The complexity of computation and time to conscious awareness are explored alongside memories' high-level story.
- Predictive dynamics encompass prediction feedback learning through sleeping experts algorithm while comparing CTM with GWT models.
- This paper provides an in-depth overview of the CTM model's structure while exploring various aspects related to understanding consciousness from a TCS perspective.
Authors: Lenore Blum, Manuel Blum
Abstract: The quest to understand consciousness, once the purview of philosophers and theologians, is now actively pursued by scientists of many stripes. We examine consciousness from the perspective of theoretical computer science (TCS), a branch of mathematics concerned with understanding the underlying principles of computation and complexity, including the implications and surprising consequences of resource limitations. In the spirit of Alan Turing's simple yet powerful definition of a computer, the Turing Machine (TM), and perspective of computational complexity theory, we formalize a modified version of the Global Workspace Theory (GWT) of consciousness originated by cognitive neuroscientist Bernard Baars and further developed by him, Stanislas Dehaene, Jean-Pierre Changeaux and others. We are not looking for a complex model of the brain nor of cognition, but for a simple computational model of (the admittedly complex concept of) consciousness. We do this by defining the Conscious Turing Machine (CTM), also called a conscious AI, and then we define consciousness and related notions in the CTM. While these are only mathematical (TCS) definitions, we suggest why the CTM has the feeling of consciousness. The TCS perspective provides a simple formal framework to employ tools from computational complexity theory and machine learning to help us understand consciousness and related concepts. Previously we explored high level explanations for the feelings of pain and pleasure in the CTM. Here we consider three examples related to vision (blindsight, inattentional blindness, and change blindness), followed by discussions of dreams, free will, and altered states of consciousness.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.