In their study "Net Buying Pressure and the Information in Bitcoin Option Trades," researchers Carol Alexander, Jun Deng, Jianfen Feng, and Huning Wan examine how supply and demand from informed traders influence market prices of bitcoin options. The study utilizes tick-level data from Deribit options and supports the limits-to-arbitrage hypothesis regarding market maker supply. The findings reveal that at-the-money option prices are primarily driven by volatility traders while out-of-the-money options are influenced by both volatility traders and individuals with proprietary information about future bitcoin price movements. This highlights a shift in demand-side effects within the bitcoin options market compared to previous studies on established options markets in the US and Asia. Specifically, Deribit is rapidly evolving into a more efficient platform for aggregating information from informed traders. The study also delves into the dynamics of directional-learning versus volatility-learning among traders in different types of options contracts over various time periods. The analysis indicates that in 2019 and 2020, both volatility-driven demands and directional-motivated demands impact out-of-the-money and deep-out-of-the-money implied volatility changes. However, only volatility information drives at-the-money option trades during this period. This suggests that informed traders with privileged knowledge about volatility and directionality tend to prefer trading cheaper out-of-the-money options rather than more expensive at-the-money options. Furthermore, the study contrasts findings from well-developed markets where directional-learning typically outweighs volatility-learning. However, in 2021, only directional-learning is evident in at-the-money put options due to the bitcoin price bubble phenomenon. Overall, these insights shed light on how informed traders' behaviors shape market prices of bitcoin options on Deribit and provide valuable implications for understanding market dynamics in cryptocurrency derivatives trading.
- - Study by Carol Alexander, Jun Deng, Jianfen Feng, and Huning Wan on Bitcoin option trades
- - At-the-money option prices driven by volatility traders; out-of-the-money options influenced by both volatility traders and individuals with proprietary information
- - Deribit evolving into an efficient platform for aggregating information from informed traders
- - Dynamics of directional-learning versus volatility-learning among traders in different options contracts over time periods
- - In 2019 and 2020, both volatility-driven demands and directional-motivated demands impact implied volatility changes
- - Preference of informed traders for trading cheaper out-of-the-money options over at-the-money options due to knowledge about volatility and directionality
- - Contrast with findings from established markets where directional-learning typically outweighs volatility-learning
- - In 2021, only directional-learning evident in at-the-money put options due to bitcoin price bubble phenomenon
Summary1. A study looked at how people trade options for Bitcoin.
2. The prices of options are affected by traders who focus on how much the price changes (volatility) and those who have special information.
3. Deribit is becoming a good place for traders to share their knowledge.
4. Traders learn about which way the price will go and how much it will change over time.
5. In recent years, traders have been more interested in predicting the price direction than the volatility.
Definitions- Options: Contracts that give someone the right to buy or sell an asset at a specific price within a certain timeframe.
- Volatility: How much the price of something changes over time.
- Informed traders: People who have special knowledge or information that helps them make better decisions in trading.
- Directionality: Predicting which way the price of an asset will move.
- Implied volatility: An estimate of how much an asset's price is expected to fluctuate in the future based on option prices.
Introduction
Cryptocurrency derivatives, such as bitcoin options, have become increasingly popular in recent years. These financial instruments allow traders to speculate on the future price movements of cryptocurrencies without actually owning them. As a result, understanding the dynamics of these markets and how they are influenced by supply and demand from informed traders is crucial for both investors and researchers.
In their study "Net Buying Pressure and the Information in Bitcoin Option Trades," Carol Alexander, Jun Deng, Jianfen Feng, and Huning Wan examine the impact of informed traders on market prices of bitcoin options. The research utilizes tick-level data from Deribit options, one of the largest cryptocurrency derivatives exchanges in terms of trading volume.
The Limits-to-Arbitrage Hypothesis
One key aspect that this study focuses on is the limits-to-arbitrage hypothesis. This theory suggests that market makers (individuals or firms who provide liquidity to a market) will only supply assets if they can do so at a profit. In other words, there must be enough demand from informed traders to offset any potential losses from providing liquidity.
The findings from this study support this hypothesis in relation to Deribit's bitcoin options market. The analysis reveals that at-the-money option prices are primarily driven by volatility traders while out-of-the-money options are influenced by both volatility traders and individuals with proprietary information about future bitcoin price movements.
This highlights a shift in demand-side effects within the bitcoin options market compared to previous studies on established options markets in the US and Asia. Specifically, Deribit is rapidly evolving into a more efficient platform for aggregating information from informed traders.
Dynamics of Directional-Learning vs Volatility-Learning
The study also delves into the dynamics of directional-learning versus volatility-learning among traders in different types of options contracts over various time periods. Directional-learning refers to when an informed trader has a view on the direction of future price movements, while volatility-learning refers to when an informed trader has information about potential changes in market volatility.
The analysis indicates that in 2019 and 2020, both volatility-driven demands and directional-motivated demands impact out-of-the-money and deep-out-of-the-money implied volatility changes. However, only volatility information drives at-the-money option trades during this period. This suggests that informed traders with privileged knowledge about volatility and directionality tend to prefer trading cheaper out-of-the-money options rather than more expensive at-the-money options.
Contrasting Findings from Established Markets
One interesting aspect of this study is how it contrasts findings from well-developed markets where directional-learning typically outweighs volatility-learning. In these established markets, traders tend to have more confidence in their predictions about future price movements rather than market volatility.
However, in 2021, the study finds that only directional-learning is evident in at-the-money put options due to the bitcoin price bubble phenomenon. This suggests that during periods of extreme market speculation or irrational exuberance, traders may prioritize predicting price direction over considering potential changes in market volatility.
Implications for Cryptocurrency Derivatives Trading
Overall, this research provides valuable insights into how informed traders' behaviors shape market prices of bitcoin options on Deribit. The findings highlight the importance of understanding supply and demand dynamics within cryptocurrency derivatives markets as they continue to evolve rapidly.
For investors, these insights can help inform their trading strategies by providing a better understanding of how different types of informed traders influence market prices. For researchers, this study adds to the growing body of literature on cryptocurrency derivatives trading and offers new perspectives on well-established theories such as the limits-to-arbitrage hypothesis.
In conclusion, "Net Buying Pressure and the Information in Bitcoin Option Trades" sheds light on how supply and demand from informed traders impact market prices of bitcoin options on Deribit. The study provides valuable implications for understanding market dynamics in cryptocurrency derivatives trading and highlights the need for further research in this rapidly evolving field.