, , , ,
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of technologies designed for personal data self-management in the context of interfacing with administrative and territorial public service providers. The study categorizes various scientific technologies into four distinct groups: Personal Data Store (PDS), Identity Manager (IdM), Anonymous Certificate System, and Access Control Delegation Architecture. Each category is thoroughly analyzed based on eighteen functional criteria that cover architectural, communication, and user data lifecycle considerations. The significance of this research lies in its unique approach. Firstly, it provides an extensive survey covering a wide range of existing solutions, filling a gap in the current literature. Secondly, it addresses the management of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for both administrative and private service providers, offering valuable insights for enhancing data protection practices. Thirdly, the paper conducts a functional comparison of solutions with diverse technical characteristics, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. By identifying functional gaps in each solution, this study paves the way for future research directions aimed at addressing these shortcomings. The analysis not only sheds light on the existing technological landscape but also offers valuable recommendations for improving data self-management practices in online administrative services. With the growing importance of digital self-determination and privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), this research serves as a timely contribution to advancing personal data security and governance measures.
- - Comprehensive survey of technologies for personal data self-management in interfacing with public service providers
- - Categorization into four groups: Personal Data Store (PDS), Identity Manager (IdM), Anonymous Certificate System, and Access Control Delegation Architecture
- - Analysis based on eighteen functional criteria covering architectural, communication, and user data lifecycle considerations
- - Unique approach filling a gap in current literature by providing extensive survey, addressing management of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for administrative and private service providers, and conducting functional comparison of solutions with diverse technical characteristics
Summary- A big study looked at different ways people can control their personal information when using public services.
- The study grouped the technologies into four categories: Personal Data Store (a place to keep your data), Identity Manager (helps manage who you are online), Anonymous Certificate System (protects your identity), and Access Control Delegation Architecture (controls who can access your data).
- They looked at 18 things to see how well each technology works, including how it's built, how it communicates, and how it handles your information.
- This study is special because it covers a lot of ground not found in other research. It focuses on managing Personally Identifiable Information for both government and private services, and compares different solutions with various features.
Definitions- Personal Data Store (PDS): A place where you can store your personal information securely.
- Identity Manager (IdM): A tool that helps you manage who you are online and control access to your data.
- Anonymous Certificate System: A system that provides certificates without revealing personal details to protect privacy.
- Access Control Delegation Architecture: A structure that determines who can access your data and under what conditions.
- Personally Identifiable Information (PII): Information that can be used to identify a specific individual, such as name, address, or social security number.
Introduction
In today's digital age, the management and protection of personal data have become a pressing concern. With the increasing use of online administrative services, individuals are required to share their Personally Identifiable Information (PII) with various public service providers. This raises concerns about privacy and security, as well as the potential misuse or mishandling of sensitive data.
To address these issues, researchers have been exploring different technological solutions for personal data self-management. However, there is currently no comprehensive survey that covers all existing technologies in this field. This research paper aims to fill this gap by providing an extensive analysis of technologies designed for personal data self-management in the context of interfacing with administrative and territorial public service providers.
Categorization of Technologies
The study categorizes existing solutions into four distinct groups: Personal Data Store (PDS), Identity Manager (IdM), Anonymous Certificate System, and Access Control Delegation Architecture. Each category is thoroughly analyzed based on eighteen functional criteria that cover architectural, communication, and user data lifecycle considerations.
Personal Data Store (PDS)
A PDS is a secure storage system that allows individuals to store their personal data and control its access by third parties. The paper identifies three types of PDS: local storage on the user's device, remote storage managed by a trusted third party, and hybrid solutions combining both approaches.
Identity Manager (IdM)
An IdM system manages digital identities for users interacting with online services. It provides authentication mechanisms such as username/password or biometric methods to verify a user's identity before granting access to their personal data.
Anonymous Certificate System
This type of system generates anonymous certificates that can be used instead of disclosing real PII when accessing online services. These certificates contain only necessary information for identification purposes without revealing any personally identifiable data.
Access Control Delegation Architecture
This architecture enables individuals to delegate access control of their personal data to third parties, such as service providers or trusted intermediaries. This allows for more granular control over who can access and use their data.
Functional Comparison and Analysis
The paper conducts a functional comparison of solutions within each category, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. It identifies common functionalities among different technologies, such as user authentication, data storage, and consent management. However, it also reveals significant differences in terms of technical characteristics and capabilities.
For example, PDS solutions offer varying levels of security measures for protecting stored data. Some rely on encryption techniques while others use secure hardware modules or blockchain technology. Similarly, IdM systems differ in the types of authentication methods they support and the level of trust established between users and service providers.
The analysis also identifies functional gaps in each solution that need to be addressed to enhance personal data self-management practices. For instance, some PDS solutions lack support for managing multiple identities or providing fine-grained access control options. On the other hand, IdM systems may not have mechanisms for revoking consent once it is granted.
Implications and Future Directions
The significance of this research lies in its unique approach towards analyzing existing technologies for personal data self-management. By providing a comprehensive survey covering a wide range of solutions with diverse technical characteristics, this study offers valuable insights into enhancing privacy protection practices.
Furthermore, with the increasing importance placed on digital self-determination and privacy regulations such as GDPR, this research serves as a timely contribution towards advancing personal data security measures. The identified functional gaps can guide future research directions aimed at addressing these shortcomings and improving overall data governance practices.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this paper presents a detailed survey of technologies designed for personal data self-management in online administrative services. By categorizing and analyzing existing solutions based on functional criteria, it offers a comprehensive overview of the current technological landscape in this field. The study not only highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different technologies but also provides valuable recommendations for improving data self-management practices. With the increasing concerns surrounding personal data privacy, this research serves as a timely contribution towards enhancing data protection measures for individuals interacting with public service providers.