Personal information self-management: A survey of technologies supporting administrative services

AI-generated keywords: Personal data self-management

AI-generated Key Points

  • Comprehensive survey of technologies for personal data self-management in interfacing with public service providers
  • Categorization into four groups: Personal Data Store (PDS), Identity Manager (IdM), Anonymous Certificate System, and Access Control Delegation Architecture
  • Analysis based on eighteen functional criteria covering architectural, communication, and user data lifecycle considerations
  • Unique approach filling a gap in current literature by providing extensive survey, addressing management of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for administrative and private service providers, and conducting functional comparison of solutions with diverse technical characteristics
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Paul Marillonnet, Maryline Laurent, Mikaël Ates

Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2021
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: This paper presents a survey of technologies for personal data self-management interfacing with administrative and territorial public service providers. It classifies a selection of scientific technologies into four categories of solutions: Personal Data Store (PDS), Identity Manager (IdM), Anonymous Certificate System and Access Control Delegation Architecture. Each category, along with its technological approach, is analyzed thanks to eighteen identified functional criteria that encompass architectural and communication aspects, as well as user data lifecycle considerations. The originality of the survey is multifold. First, as far as we know, there is no such thorough survey covering such a panel of a dozen of existing solutions. Second, it is the first survey addressing Personally Identifiable Information (PII) management for both administrative and private service providers. Third, this paper achieves a functional comparison of solutions of very different technical natures. The outcome of this paper is the clear identification of functional gaps of each solution. As a result, this paper establishes the research directions to follow in order to fill these functional gaps.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Sep. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.12968v1

, , , , This paper presents a comprehensive survey of technologies designed for personal data self-management in the context of interfacing with administrative and territorial public service providers. The study categorizes various scientific technologies into four distinct groups: Personal Data Store (PDS), Identity Manager (IdM), Anonymous Certificate System, and Access Control Delegation Architecture. Each category is thoroughly analyzed based on eighteen functional criteria that cover architectural, communication, and user data lifecycle considerations. The significance of this research lies in its unique approach. Firstly, it provides an extensive survey covering a wide range of existing solutions, filling a gap in the current literature. Secondly, it addresses the management of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for both administrative and private service providers, offering valuable insights for enhancing data protection practices. Thirdly, the paper conducts a functional comparison of solutions with diverse technical characteristics, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. By identifying functional gaps in each solution, this study paves the way for future research directions aimed at addressing these shortcomings. The analysis not only sheds light on the existing technological landscape but also offers valuable recommendations for improving data self-management practices in online administrative services. With the growing importance of digital self-determination and privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), this research serves as a timely contribution to advancing personal data security and governance measures.
Created on 02 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.