Clustering Market Regimes using the Wasserstein Distance
AI-generated Key Points
- Problem: Detecting distinct market regimes in a rapid and automated manner
- Proposed solution: Unsupervised learning algorithm for clustering financial time-series into temporal segments or market regimes
- Development of a robust algorithm for automating the classification process of these regimes
- Method does not rely on modeling assumptions of underlying time series, making it robust and applicable to real datasets
- Algorithm called the Wasserstein k-means algorithm, frames the problem as one on the space of probability measures with finite p-th moment
- Utilizes p-Wasserstein distance between empirical distributions to cluster the time-series
- Performance evaluation through comparison with traditional clustering algorithms using maximum mean discrepancy scores within and between clusters
- Results show that the Wasserstein k-means algorithm outperforms all competitor approaches significantly
- Effectiveness demonstrated through experiments on synthetic data and real financial data
- Detailed analysis provided along with figures to support findings
Authors: Blanka Horvath, Zacharia Issa, Aitor Muguruza
Abstract: The problem of rapid and automated detection of distinct market regimes is a topic of great interest to financial mathematicians and practitioners alike. In this paper, we outline an unsupervised learning algorithm for clustering financial time-series into a suitable number of temporal segments (market regimes). As a special case of the above, we develop a robust algorithm that automates the process of classifying market regimes. The method is robust in the sense that it does not depend on modelling assumptions of the underlying time series as our experiments with real datasets show. This method -- dubbed the Wasserstein $k$-means algorithm -- frames such a problem as one on the space of probability measures with finite $p^\text{th}$ moment, in terms of the $p$-Wasserstein distance between (empirical) distributions. We compare our WK-means approach with a more traditional clustering algorithms by studying the so-called maximum mean discrepancy scores between, and within clusters. In both cases it is shown that the WK-means algorithm vastly outperforms all considered competitor approaches. We demonstrate the performance of all approaches both in a controlled environment on synthetic data, and on real data.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.