A targeted search for strongly lensed supernovae and expectations for targeted searches in the Rubin era

AI-generated keywords: Gravitationally lensed supernovae Detection Efficiency Monte Carlo Simulation Rubin Observatory Targeted Survey

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study focuses on the detection of gravitationally lensed supernovae (glSNe)
  • glSNe are important for time delay cosmology and supernova physics
  • The authors present the Las Cumbres Observatory Lensed Supernova Search (LCOLSS), a targeted survey designed to detect glSNe in known strong-lensing systems
  • LCOLSS targeted 112 galaxy-galaxy lensing systems with high expected supernova rates based on estimated star formation rates
  • No plausible glSN was detected during two years of observing
  • The analysis measures the detection efficiency of these observations and performs a Monte Carlo simulation using predicted supernova rates to determine the expected number of glSN detections
  • Expected number of detections and 68% Poisson confidence intervals:
  • N_SN = 0.20, [0,2.1]
  • N_Ia = 0.08, [0,2.0]
  • N_CC = 0.12, [0,2.0]
  • for all supernovae, Type Ia supernovae and core-collapse (CC) supernovae respectively
  • These results align with the absence of any detection in the survey
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Peter Craig, Kyle O'Connor, Sukanya Chakrabarti, Steven A. Rodney, Justin R. Pierel, Curtis McCully, Ismael Perez-Fournon

arXiv: 2111.01680v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
19 pages, 10 figures, 5 tables. Submitted to MNRAS

Abstract: Gravitationally lensed supernovae (glSNe) are of interest for time delay cosmology and SN physics. However, glSNe detections are rare, owing to the intrinsic rarity of SN explosions, the necessity of alignment with a foreground lens, and the relatively short window of detectability. We present the Las Cumbres Observatory Lensed Supernova Search, LCOLSS, a targeted survey designed for detecting glSNe in known strong-lensing systems. Using cadenced $r^\prime$-band imaging, LCOLSS targeted 112 galaxy-galaxy lensing systems with high expected SN rates, based on estimated star formation rates. No plausible glSN was detected by LCOLSS over two years of observing. The analysis performed here measures a detection efficiency for these observations and runs a Monte Carlo simulation using the predicted supernova rates to determine the expected number of glSN detections. The results of the simulation suggest an expected number of detections and $68\%$ Poisson confidence intervals, $N_{SN} = 0.20, [0,2.1] $, $N_{Ia} = 0.08, [0,2.0]$, $N_{CC} = 0.12, [0,2.0]$, for all SN, Type Ia, and core-collapse (CC) SNe respectively. These results are broadly consistent with the absence of a detection in our survey. Analysis of the survey strategy can provide insights for future efforts to develop targeted glSN discovery programs. We thereby forecast expected detection rates for the Rubin observatory for such a targeted survey, finding that a single visit depth of 24.7 mag with the Rubin observatory will detect $0.63 \pm 0.38$ SNe per year, with $0.47 \pm 0.28$ core collapse SNe per year and $0.16 \pm 0.10$ Type Ia SNe per year.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Nov. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2111.01680v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study focuses on the detection of gravitationally lensed supernovae (glSNe), which are important for time delay cosmology and supernova physics. To address this challenge, the authors present the Las Cumbres Observatory Lensed Supernova Search (LCOLSS), a targeted survey designed to detect glSNe in known strong-lensing systems. Using cadenced $r^\prime$-band imaging, LCOLSS targeted 112 galaxy-galaxy lensing systems with high expected supernova rates based on estimated star formation rates. However, no plausible glSN was detected during two years of observing. The analysis measures the detection efficiency of these observations and performs a Monte Carlo simulation using predicted supernova rates to determine the expected number of glSN detections. The results suggest an expected number of detections and $68\%$ Poisson confidence intervals: $N_{SN} = 0.20, [0,2.1]$, $N_{Ia} = 0.08, [0,2.0]$, $N_{CC} = 0.12, [0,2.0]$ for all supernovae, Type Ia supernovae and core-collapse (CC) supernovae respectively; aligning with the absence of any detection in the survey.
Created on 03 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.