Classifying Human Activities with Inertial Sensors: A Machine Learning Approach

AI-generated keywords: Human Activity Recognition (HAR)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a rapidly evolving field of research with applications in various domains
  • Traditional computer vision methods for HAR had limitations including privacy concerns, environmental influences, limited mobility, high costs, and occlusion
  • A new trend has emerged in the use of sensors, particularly inertial sensors
  • The study examines different Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches for HAR using inertial sensor data from smartphones
  • Section II provides a review of related work in the field of HAR, discussing various models and techniques proposed by other researchers
  • Section III focuses on the dataset used for experimentation in this study, utilizing the UCI-HAR/SMARTPHONE dataset widely used in HAR research
  • Section IV delves into the details of the Machine Learning classifiers trained for activity categorization using sensor data
  • Section V compares the results obtained from all the models trained in this study, analyzing performance metrics such as accuracy to determine the best approach
  • Section VI concludes the paper by summarizing findings and discussing implications for future research in Human Activity Recognition using inertial sensor data
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hamza Ali Imran, Saad Wazir, Usman Iftikhar, Usama Latif

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is an ongoing research topic. It has applications in medical support, sports, fitness, social networking, human-computer interfaces, senior care, entertainment, surveillance, and the list goes on. Traditionally, computer vision methods were employed for HAR, which has numerous problems such as secrecy or privacy, the influence of environmental factors, less mobility, higher running costs, occlusion, and so on. A new trend in the use of sensors, especially inertial sensors, has lately emerged. There are several advantages of employing sensor data as an alternative to traditional computer vision algorithms. Many of the limitations of computer vision algorithms have been documented in the literature, including research on Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Machine Learning (ML) approaches for activity categorization utilizing sensor data. We examined and analyzed different Machine Learning and Deep Learning approaches for Human Activity Recognition using inertial sensor data of smartphones. In order to identify which approach is best suited for this application.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Nov. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2111.05333v1

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a rapidly evolving field of research with applications in various domains such as medical support, sports, fitness, social networking, human-computer interfaces, senior care, entertainment, and surveillance. Traditionally, computer vision methods were used for HAR but they had several limitations including privacy concerns, environmental influences, limited mobility, high costs, and occlusion. However, a new trend has emerged in the use of sensors, particularly inertial sensors. In this study, the authors examined different Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches for HAR using inertial sensor data from smartphones. The goal was to identify the most suitable approach for this application. The paper is structured into several sections. Section II provides a review of related work in the field of HAR. It discusses various models and techniques proposed by other researchers. For example, Imran et al. presented a novel convolutional neural network model with inception-like multi-sized kernel models and achieved 89.44% accuracy on the UCI-HAR/SMARTPHONE dataset. Mehmood et al. also used a convolutional neural network on smartphone data and achieved 91.61% accuracy. Section III focuses on the dataset used for experimentation in this study. The authors utilized the UCI-HAR/SMARTPHONE dataset that has been widely used in HAR research for activity categorization using sensor data . Section IV delves into the details of the Machine Learning classifiers that were trained for activity categorization using sensor data . The specific algorithms and architectures employed are discussed here . Section V compares the results obtained from all the models trained in this study . The performance metrics such as accuracy are analyzed to determine which approach yielded the best results . Finally , Section VI concludes the paper by summarizing the findings and discussing their implications for future research in Human Activity Recognition using inertial sensor data . In addition to these sections mentioned above , there are additional subsections within each section that provide further details and analysis . Overall , this study aims to contribute to the advancement of HAR techniques by exploring and evaluating different ML and DL approaches using smartphone sensor data .
Created on 11 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.