FedCostWAvg: A new averaging for better Federated Learning
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper presents a novel aggregation strategy called FedCostWAvg for federated learning
- FedCostWAvg achieved success in the MICCAI Federated Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2021
- The authors address the problem of aggregating multiple models trained on different datasets
- FedCostWAvg is an extension of the current state-of-the-art technique known as FedAvg
- Empirical validation shows significant improvements in segmentation performance compared to FedAvg
- FedCostWAvg offers a simple yet effective solution to enhance federated learning outcomes
- The approach tackles the critical issue of combining models trained on diverse data sources
- The authors include Leon Mächler, Ivan Ezhov, Florian Kofler, Suprosanna Shit, Johannes C. Paetzold, Timo Loehr, Benedikt Wiestler, and Bjoern Menze
- Their work showcases their expertise and contributions to advancing federated learning techniques
- This research introduces an innovative approach that has proven successful in a competitive setting and holds promise for further advancements in federated learning applications.
Authors: Leon Mächler, Ivan Ezhov, Florian Kofler, Suprosanna Shit, Johannes C. Paetzold, Timo Loehr, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze
Abstract: We propose a simple new aggregation strategy for federated learning that won the MICCAI Federated Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2021 (FETS), the first ever challenge on Federated Learning in the Machine Learning community. Our method addresses the problem of how to aggregate multiple models that were trained on different data sets. Conceptually, we propose a new way to choose the weights when averaging the different models, thereby extending the current state of the art (FedAvg). Empirical validation demonstrates that our approach reaches a notable improvement in segmentation performance compared to FedAvg.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.