Studying Buildings Outlines to Assess and Predict Energy Performance in Buildings: A Probabilistic Approach
Authors: Zohreh Shaghaghian, Fatemeh Shahsavari, Elham Delzendeh
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper explores the use of predictive models to inform architects and designers about the impact of design decisions on energy consumption in buildings during early design stages.
- Building performance is typically calculated during the final phases of design, so incorporating predictive models earlier can provide valuable insights.
- The study focuses on evaluating the impact of a building's outline on energy consumption using synthetic data.
- Buildings with square shapes tend to be more energy-efficient compared to T, U, and L shapes of the same volume.
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to assess correlations between variables in the data distribution.
- Wall material specifications explain approximately 40% of data variation.
- Degree 2 polynomial regression models achieve high accuracy levels with over 98% R squared (coefficient of determination).
- Considering a building's outline is important in assessing and predicting its energy performance during early design stages.
- Synthetic data and probabilistic approaches, along with advanced modeling techniques like polynomial regression and PCA analysis, can help architects and designers make informed decisions regarding energy efficiency.
Abstract: Building performance is commonly calculated during the last phases of design, where most design specifications get fixed and are unlikely to be majorly modified based on design programs. Predictive models could play a significant role in informing architects and designers of the impact of their design decisions on energy consumption in buildings during early design stages. A building outline is a significant predictor of the final energy consumption and is conceptually determined by architects in the early design phases. This paper evaluates the impact of a building's outline on energy consumption using synthetic data to achieve appropriate predictive models in estimating a building's energy consumption. Four office outlines are selected in this study, including square, T, U, and L shapes. Besides the shape parameter, other building features commonly used in literature (i.e., Window to Wall Ratio (WWR), external wall material properties, glazing U value, windows' shading depth, and building orientation) are utilized in generating data distribution with a probabilistic approach. The results show that buildings with square shapes, in general, are more energy-efficient compared to buildings with T, U, and L shapes of the same volume. Also, T, U, and L shape samples show very similar behavior in terms of energy consumption. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied to assess the variables' correlations on data distribution; the results show that wall material specifications explain about 40% of data variation. Finally, we applied polynomial regression models with different degrees of complexity to predict the synthesized building models' energy consumptions based on their outlines. The results show that degree 2 polynomial models, fitting the data over 98% R squared (coefficient of determination), could be used to predict new samples with high accuracy.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.