A Survey of Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated keywords: Generalisation Deep Reinforcement Learning Benchmark Design Offline RL Generalisation Reward-Function Variation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Generalisation in deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to produce RL algorithms that can adapt and perform well in novel, unseen situations at deployment time.
  • It is crucial for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where the environment is diverse, dynamic, and unpredictable.
  • The survey titled "A Survey of Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning" provides an overview of this emerging field.
  • The authors introduce a unifying formalism and terminology to discuss different generalisation problems.
  • Avoiding overfitting to training environments and policies that can generalize effectively are highlighted as important factors.
  • Existing benchmarks for generalisation are categorized and current methods used to tackle the problem are examined.
  • Various approaches and techniques employed in deep RL algorithms to enhance generalization capabilities are explored.
  • The current state of the field is critically evaluated, with recommendations for future work such as fast online adaptation and addressing RL-specific challenges.
  • Relying solely on procedural content generation approaches for benchmark design is argued against, proposing exploration of underexplored problem settings like offline RL generalisation and reward-function variation when constructing benchmarks.
  • The survey provides a comprehensive overview of the nascent field of generalisation in deep RL, offering valuable insights into different aspects of generalisation problems while highlighting key areas for future research and development.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Robert Kirk, Amy Zhang, Edward Grefenstette, Tim Rocktäschel

Abstract: The study of generalisation in deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to produce RL algorithms whose policies generalise well to novel unseen situations at deployment time, avoiding overfitting to their training environments. Tackling this is vital if we are to deploy reinforcement learning algorithms in real world scenarios, where the environment will be diverse, dynamic and unpredictable. This survey is an overview of this nascent field. We provide a unifying formalism and terminology for discussing different generalisation problems, building upon previous works. We go on to categorise existing benchmarks for generalisation, as well as current methods for tackling the generalisation problem. Finally, we provide a critical discussion of the current state of the field, including recommendations for future work. Among other conclusions, we argue that taking a purely procedural content generation approach to benchmark design is not conducive to progress in generalisation, we suggest fast online adaptation and tackling RL-specific problems as some areas for future work on methods for generalisation, and we recommend building benchmarks in underexplored problem settings such as offline RL generalisation and reward-function variation.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Nov. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2111.09794v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study of generalisation in deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to produce RL algorithms that can adapt and perform well in novel, unseen situations at deployment time. This is crucial for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where the environment is diverse, dynamic, and unpredictable. In their survey titled "A Survey of Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning," authors Robert Kirk, Amy Zhang, Edward Grefenstette, and Tim Rocktäschel provide an overview of this emerging field. The authors begin by introducing a unifying formalism and terminology to discuss different generalisation problems, building upon previous works. They emphasize the importance of avoiding overfitting to training environments and highlight the need for policies that can generalize effectively. Next, the authors categorize existing benchmarks for generalisation and examine current methods used to tackle the generalisation problem. They explore various approaches and techniques employed in deep RL algorithms to enhance generalization capabilities. In addition to discussing existing research, the authors critically evaluate the current state of the field. They offer recommendations for future work such as fast online adaptation and addressing RL-specific challenges. The authors argue against relying solely on procedural content generation approaches for benchmark design as it may hinder progress in generalisation. Furthermore, they propose exploring underexplored problem settings like offline RL generalisation and reward-function variation when constructing benchmarks so researchers can gain insights into how RL algorithms perform in these less-explored scenarios. Overall, this survey provides a comprehensive overview of the nascent field of generalisation in deep RL. It offers valuable insights into different aspects of generalisation problems while highlighting key areas for future research and development that could further improve performance on real-world tasks.
Created on 01 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.