A dynamics-based density profile for dark haloes. I. Algorithm and basic results

AI-generated keywords: Dark Matter Haloes Density Profiles Dynamics LCDM Model Matter Power Spectrum

AI-generated Key Points

  • Dynamics-based density profile for dark matter haloes
  • Potential insights into dynamics, fundamental physics, and cosmology
  • Promising signals near or beyond the virial radius
  • Distribution of orbiting matter partially hidden by infalling particles
  • Algorithm to separate contributions from orbiting and infalling matter
  • Analysis of dynamically split profiles up to 10 times the R200m across various parameters
  • Truncation in orbiting term determined by halo mass accretion rate
  • Factors like mass, redshift, and cosmology have some influence on profile shape but are secondary to halo dynamics
  • Infalling term influenced by accretion rate for fast-accreting haloes and environmental factors for slow-accreting ones
  • Diverse array of shapes not conforming to simple theoretical models with scatter reaching up to 1 dex
  • Smaller scatter in orbiting term ranging between 0.1 - 0.4 dex independent from radius
  • Close correspondence between redshift evolution in LCDM model and slope of matter power spectrum supporting validity of LCDM as cosmological model
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Benedikt Diemer

arXiv: 2112.03921v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
21 pages, 11 figures. Additional figures at http://www.benediktdiemer.com/data/halo-density-profiles/ . Comments welcome
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: The density profiles of dark matter haloes can potentially probe dynamics, fundamental physics, and cosmology, but some of the most promising signals reside near or beyond the virial radius. While these scales have recently become observable, the profiles at large radii are still poorly understood theoretically, chiefly because the distribution of orbiting matter (the one-halo term) is partially concealed by particles falling into halos for the first time. We present an algorithm to dynamically disentangle the orbiting and infalling contributions by counting the pericentric passages of billions of simulation particles. We analyse dynamically split profiles out to 10 R200m across a wide range of halo mass, redshift, and cosmology. We show that the orbiting term experiences a sharp truncation at the edge of the orbit distribution. Its sharpness and position are mostly determined by the mass accretion rate, confirming that the entire profile shape primarily depends on halo dynamics and secondarily on mass, redshift, and cosmology. The infalling term also depends on the accretion rate for fast-accreting haloes but is mostly set by the environment for slowly accreting haloes, leading to a diverse array of shapes that does not conform to simple theoretical models. While the resulting scatter in the infalling term reaches 1 dex, the scatter in the orbiting term is only between 0.1 and 0.4 dex and almost independent of radius. We demonstrate a tight correspondence between the redshift evolution in LCDM and the slope of the matter power spectrum.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.03921v1

This paper presents a dynamics-based density profile for dark matter haloes, focusing on the algorithm and basic results. The density profiles of dark matter haloes have the potential to provide insights into dynamics, fundamental physics, and cosmology. However, the most promising signals are often found near or beyond the virial radius, which has only recently become observable. One of the main challenges in understanding the density profiles at large radii is that the distribution of orbiting matter (known as the one-halo term) is partially hidden by particles falling into haloes for the first time. To address this issue, the authors propose an algorithm that dynamically separates the contributions from orbiting and infalling matter by counting pericentric passages of billions of simulation particles. Using this algorithm, they analyze dynamically split profiles up to 10 times the R200m (the radius within which a halo has an average density 200 times higher than the critical density) across a wide range of halo mass, redshift, and cosmology. The results reveal important insights into both orbiting and infalling profiles. The study finds that the orbiting term experiences a sharp truncation at the edge of its orbit distribution. The sharpness and position of this truncation are primarily determined by halo mass accretion rate, indicating that halo dynamics play a crucial role in shaping its entire profile. Additionally, while factors such as mass, redshift and cosmology have some influence on profile shape; they are secondary compared to halo dynamics. The infalling term also depends on accretion rate for fast-accreting haloes but is mostly influenced by environmental factors for slowly accreting ones; leading to diverse array of shapes not conforming to simple theoretical models with scatter reaching up to 1 dex (an order of magnitude). In contrast; scatter in orbiting term is much smaller ranging between 0.1 - 0.4 dex remaining almost independent from radius. The authors demonstrate close correspondence between redshift evolution in LCDM model and slope of matter power spectrum further supporting validity of LCDM as cosmological model.
Created on 12 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.