Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Libraries: A Systematic Review

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Libraries Systematic Literature Review Empirical Studies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Systematic literature review on the application of AI and ML in libraries
  • Data collected from various databases including Web of Science, Scopus, LISA, and LISTA
  • 32 articles selected for review and analysis
  • Current state of AI and ML research in libraries focuses on theoretical works, implementation projects, and case studies
  • Identified AI and ML techniques commonly used in libraries summarized in Table 2
  • Inclusion criteria: English language, ML or AI applications, Library and Information Science sub-area with relevant titles, abstracts, and keywords
  • Exclusion criteria: non-digital publications, unavailable for full review, non-English language without ML or AI applications in libraries
  • Initial screening based on title and abstract followed by assessment using inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • Panoramic view of AI and ML in libraries provided for researchers, practitioners, educators interested in technology-oriented approaches
  • Highlights the need for further research and innovation pathways in this field
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rajesh Kumar Das, Mohammad Sharif Ul Islam

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: As the concept and implementation of cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning has become relevant, academics, researchers and information professionals involve research in this area. The objective of this systematic literature review is to provide a synthesis of empirical studies exploring application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in libraries. To achieve the objectives of the study, a systematic literature review was conducted based on the original guidelines proposed by Kitchenham et al. (2009). Data was collected from Web of Science, Scopus, LISA and LISTA databases. Following the rigorous/ established selection process, a total of thirty-two articles were finally selected, reviewed and analyzed to summarize on the application of AI and ML domain and techniques which are most often used in libraries. Findings show that the current state of the AI and ML research that is relevant with the LIS domain mainly focuses on theoretical works. However, some researchers also emphasized on implementation projects or case studies. This study will provide a panoramic view of AI and ML in libraries for researchers, practitioners and educators for furthering the more technology-oriented approaches, and anticipating future innovation pathways.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.04573v1

This systematic literature review explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in libraries. The objective of the study is to provide a synthesis of empirical studies in this area. The researchers conducted a systematic literature review based on established guidelines, collecting data from various databases including Web of Science, Scopus, LISA, and LISTA. After a rigorous selection process, 32 articles were selected for review and analysis. The findings reveal that the current state of AI and ML research in libraries mainly focuses on theoretical works, although some researchers also emphasize implementation projects or case studies. The study identifies the AI and ML techniques most often used in libraries and summarizes them in Table 2. These techniques include machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence methods applied to different aspects of library operations. The inclusion criteria for articles in this review were that they must be written in English, discuss ML or AI applications, belong to the sub-area of Library and Information Science, and have titles, abstracts, and keywords related to libraries with the application of either machine learning or artificial intelligence. Exclusion criteria included non-digital publications, publications not available for full review, articles not in English language, and those without any application of ML or AI in libraries. The study selection process involved an initial screening based on title and abstract followed by assessment using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 379 articles were initially retrieved from various databases but after removing duplicates (16.09%), 286 papers remained. Finally, 32 articles were included in the systematic review. This study provides a panoramic view of AI and ML in libraries for researchers, practitioners, and educators interested in technology-oriented approaches. It highlights the need for further research and innovation pathways in this field. Overall, it contributes to the understanding of how cutting-edge technologies like AI and ML are being applied within library settings.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.