Collaborating with communities: Citizen Science Flood Monitoring in Urban Informal Settlements

AI-generated keywords: Citizen Science Marginalized Communities Flood Risk Reduction Communication Platforms Climate Change Adaptation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Citizen science can include marginalized urban communities in flood risk reduction planning processes
  • The Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environment (RISE) Program collected over 5000 photos from community members in Fiji and Indonesia
  • Citizen science projects can engage communities in risk management and gain support from local authorities
  • Access to technology and familiarity with communication platforms can influence community engagement
  • Adapting frameworks and practices to local contexts is important in citizen science initiatives
  • Acknowledging contributors publicly as "contributors of the month" was effective in gathering flood data in Indonesia
  • Citizen science promotes participatory risk management practices and gives voice to marginalized communities in climate change adaptation efforts.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Erich Wolff, Matthew French, Noor Ilhamsyah, Mere Jane Sawailau, Diego Ramirez-Lovering

Urban Planning. 6(4) (2021) 351-364
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Concerns regarding the impacts of climate change on marginalised communities in the Global South have led to calls for affected communities to be more active as agents in the process of planning for climate change. While the value of involving communities in risk management is increasingly accepted, the development of appropriate tools to support community engagement in flood risk management projects remains nascent. Using the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environment (RISE) Program as a case study, the article interrogates the potential of citizen science to include disadvantaged urban communities in project-level flood risk reduction planning processes. This project collected more than 5000 photos taken by 26 community members living in 13 informal settlements in Fiji and Indonesia between 2018 and 2020. The case study documents the method used as well as the results achieved within this 2-year project. It discusses the method developed and implemented, outlines the main results, and provides lessons learned for others embarking on citizen science environmental monitoring projects. The case study indicates that the engagement model and the technology used were key to the success of the flood-monitoring project. The experiences with the practice of monitoring floods in collaboration with communities in Fiji and Indonesia provide insights into how similar projects could advance more participatory risk management practices. The article identifies how this kind of approach can collect valuable flood data while also promoting opportunities for local communities to be heard in the arena of risk reduction and climate change adaptation.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.07128v1

This article explores the potential of citizen science in including marginalized urban communities in flood risk reduction planning processes. The case study focuses on the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environment (RISE) Program, which collected over 5000 photos taken by community members living in informal settlements in Fiji and Indonesia between 2018 and 2020. The study discusses the method used, outlines the main results, and provides lessons learned for future citizen science environmental monitoring projects. The findings suggest that citizen science projects can be valuable tools for engaging communities in risk management. In Indonesia, local authorities expressed interest in such projects, highlighting the importance of identifying supportive stakeholders. It is also crucial to consider how citizen science projects offer data back to the community, ensuring that residents have access to relevant project results that can help them manage disaster risks at a local scale. The case study reveals that unequal access to technology and familiarity with communication platforms can influence community engagement. Participants from Fiji reported being less familiar with messaging applications and sharing photos through the internet compared to participants from Makassar. Therefore, it is essential for citizen science initiatives to consider existing communication practices and technologies used by community members. To improve engagement and consistent monitoring, RISE's flood-monitoring framework adapted to better communicate with participants. This highlights the importance of adapting frameworks and practices to local contexts within planning and citizen science fields. In Indonesia, acknowledging contributors publicly as "contributors of the month" proved effective in gathering flood data. Overall, this case study demonstrates how citizen science can collect valuable data while promoting participatory risk management practices. By involving marginalized communities in flood risk reduction planning processes, these initiatives provide opportunities for local voices to be heard in climate change adaptation efforts.
Created on 01 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.