Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors address lack of control over pre-trained representations in neural models trained on textual data
- Proposed method identifies and erases linear subspace corresponding to a specific concept
- Method aims to mitigate bias effectively by preventing recovery of the erased concept by linear predictors
- Problem framed as constrained, linear minimax game with closed-form solution for certain objectives
- Introduce R-LACE, a convex relaxation technique that performs well in other scenarios
- Experiments focused on binary gender removal show significant reduction in bias based on evaluation metrics
- Method proves highly expressive in mitigating bias within deep nonlinear classifiers while being tractable and interpretable
- Offers promising implications for improving fairness and reducing undesired influences in neural models trained on textual data
Authors: Shauli Ravfogel, Michael Twiton, Yoav Goldberg, Ryan Cotterell
Abstract: Modern neural models trained on textual data rely on pre-trained representations that emerge without direct supervision. As these representations are increasingly being used in real-world applications, the inability to \emph{control} their content becomes an increasingly important problem. We formulate the problem of identifying and erasing a linear subspace that corresponds to a given concept, in order to prevent linear predictors from recovering the concept. We model this problem as a constrained, linear minimax game, and show that existing solutions are generally not optimal for this task. We derive a closed-form solution for certain objectives, and propose a convex relaxation, R-LACE, that works well for others. When evaluated in the context of binary gender removal, the method recovers a low-dimensional subspace whose removal mitigates bias by intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. We show that the method -- despite being linear -- is highly expressive, effectively mitigating bias in deep nonlinear classifiers while maintaining tractability and interpretability.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.