A Statistical Model of Serve Return Impact Patterns in Professional Tennis

Authors: Stephanie A. Kovalchik, Jim Albert

16 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables
License: CC BY 4.0
Summaries already available in other languages: fr

Abstract: The spread in the use of tracking systems in sport has made fine-grained spatiotemporal analysis a primary focus of an emerging sports analytics industry. Recently publicized tracking data for men's professional tennis allows for the first detailed spatial analysis of return impact. Mixture models are an appealing model-based framework for spatial analysis in sport, where latent variable discovery is often of primary interest. Although finite mixture models have the advantages of interpretability and scalability, most implementations assume standard parametric distributions for outcomes conditioned on latent variables. In this paper, we present a more flexible alternative that allows the latent conditional distribution to be a mixed member of finite Gaussian mixtures. Our model was motivated by our efforts to describe common styles of return impact location of professional tennis players and is the reason we name the approach a 'latent style allocation' model. In a fully Bayesian implementation, we apply the model to 142,803 return points played by 141 top players at Association of Tennis Professional events between 2018 and 2020 and show that the latent style allocation improves predictive performance over a finite Gaussian mixture model and identifies six unique impact styles on the first and second serve return.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Feb. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.00583v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.