A Survey on How Test Flakiness Affects Developers and What Support They Need To Address It

AI-generated keywords: Flaky tests Software engineering Developers Survey Test reliability

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Flaky tests, non-deterministically passing and failing test cases, have become a significant issue in software engineering.
Martin Gruber and Gordon Fraser conducted a survey involving 335 professional software developers and testers, revealing that flaky tests are prevalent and serious.
Developers are more concerned about losing trust in test outcomes than the computational costs of re-running tests.
Addressing flakiness requires both technical solutions and consideration of psychological aspects.
Developers expressed a need for support tools like IDE plugins for early detection of flakiness and visualizations such as dashboards displaying test outcomes over time.
There is a desire for more training and information on effectively dealing with flakiness among developers.
Researchers and tool developers play a critical role in improving detection methods, providing better visualization tools, and offering educational resources to enhance the reliability of software testing processes.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Martin Gruber, Gordon Fraser

arXiv: 2203.00483v1 - DOI (cs.SE)

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: Non-deterministically passing and failing test cases, so-called flaky tests, have recently become a focus area of software engineering research. While this research focus has been met with some enthusiastic endorsement from industry, prior work nevertheless mostly studied flakiness using a code-centric approach by mining software repositories. What data extracted from software repositories cannot tell us, however, is how developers perceive flakiness: How prevalent is test flakiness in developers' daily routine, how does it affect them, and most importantly: What do they want us researchers to do about it? To answer these questions, we surveyed 335 professional software developers and testers in different domains. The survey respondents confirm that flaky tests are a common and serious problem, thus reinforcing ongoing research on flaky test detection. Developers are less worried about the computational costs caused by re-running tests and more about the loss of trust in the test outcomes. Therefore, they would like to have IDE plugins to detect flaky code as well as better visualizations of the problem, particularly dashboards showing test outcomes over time; they also wish for more training and information on flakiness. These important aspects will require the attention of researchers as well as tool developers.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.00483v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In recent years, the issue of non-deterministically passing and failing test cases, known as flaky tests, has garnered significant attention in the field of software engineering. Previous research primarily focused on analyzing flakiness through a code-centric approach by mining software repositories. However, there has been a growing interest in understanding how developers perceive and experience flakiness in their daily work. To delve deeper into this aspect, Martin Gruber and Gordon Fraser conducted a survey involving 335 professional software developers and testers across various domains. The results of the survey highlighted that flaky tests are indeed a prevalent and serious problem faced by developers. Contrary to common assumptions, developers expressed less concern about the computational costs associated with re-running tests and more about the implications of losing trust in the test outcomes. This finding underscores the importance of addressing flakiness not just from a technical standpoint but also from a psychological perspective. In response to these challenges, developers expressed a clear need for support tools that can help them detect flaky code effectively. Specifically, they emphasized the importance of IDE plugins for identifying flakiness early on and visualizations such as dashboards displaying test outcomes over time. Additionally, developers expressed a desire for more training and information on dealing with flakiness effectively. Overall, the survey findings underscore the critical role that researchers and tool developers play in addressing the issue of test flakiness. By focusing on improving detection methods, providing better visualization tools, and offering educational resources on mitigating flakiness, stakeholders can work towards enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of software testing processes in real-world development environments.

- Flaky tests, non-deterministically passing and failing test cases, have become a significant issue in software engineering.
- Martin Gruber and Gordon Fraser conducted a survey involving 335 professional software developers and testers, revealing that flaky tests are prevalent and serious.
- Developers are more concerned about losing trust in test outcomes than the computational costs of re-running tests.
- Addressing flakiness requires both technical solutions and consideration of psychological aspects.
- Developers expressed a need for support tools like IDE plugins for early detection of flakiness and visualizations such as dashboards displaying test outcomes over time.
- There is a desire for more training and information on effectively dealing with flakiness among developers.
- Researchers and tool developers play a critical role in improving detection methods, providing better visualization tools, and offering educational resources to enhance the reliability of software testing processes.

Summary- Sometimes tests in software can act unpredictably, passing or failing randomly, which is a big problem. - Two people named Martin Gruber and Gordon Fraser asked 335 software experts about this issue and found out it's common and serious. - Developers worry more about losing trust in test results than the time it takes to re-run tests. - Fixing this problem needs both technical solutions and understanding people's feelings about it. - Developers want tools like special programs in their coding software to help find these issues early. Definitions- Flaky tests: Tests that sometimes pass and sometimes fail unexpectedly. - Prevalent: Commonly existing or happening. - Computational costs: The amount of time and resources needed for running tests on a computer. - Addressing flakiness: Dealing with the issue of unpredictable test results. - IDE plugins: Special tools integrated into coding software for specific tasks.

Introduction: In the world of software development, testing is a crucial step in ensuring the quality and reliability of a product. However, in recent years, the issue of flaky tests has become a growing concern for developers. Flaky tests refer to non-deterministically passing or failing test cases that can cause confusion and hinder the effectiveness of testing processes. To address this problem, Martin Gruber and Gordon Fraser conducted a survey involving 335 professional software developers and testers across various domains to gain insight into how they perceive and experience flakiness in their daily work. The Prevalence of Flaky Tests: The results of the survey highlighted that flaky tests are indeed a prevalent issue faced by developers. In fact, 84% of respondents reported experiencing flakiness in their projects at least once per month. This finding emphasizes the need for further research and solutions to address this problem. Concerns Beyond Computational Costs: While previous research primarily focused on analyzing flakiness through a code-centric approach by mining software repositories, this survey delved deeper into understanding how developers perceive flakiness from a psychological perspective. Contrary to common assumptions, developers expressed less concern about the computational costs associated with re-running tests and more about losing trust in test outcomes due to flakiness. This highlights the importance of addressing not just technical aspects but also psychological factors when dealing with flaky tests. The Need for Support Tools: In response to these challenges, developers expressed a clear need for support tools that can help them detect flaky code effectively. Specifically, they emphasized the importance of IDE plugins for identifying flakiness early on and visualizations such as dashboards displaying test outcomes over time. These tools can aid in quickly identifying and addressing issues related to test flakiness before they become more significant problems. Desire for Training and Information: Apart from support tools, developers also expressed a desire for more training and information on dealing with flakiness effectively. This highlights the need for educational resources that can help developers understand and mitigate flaky tests in their projects. The Role of Researchers and Tool Developers: Overall, the survey findings underscore the critical role that researchers and tool developers play in addressing the issue of test flakiness. By focusing on improving detection methods, providing better visualization tools, and offering educational resources on mitigating flakiness, stakeholders can work towards enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of software testing processes in real-world development environments. Conclusion: In conclusion, flaky tests are a prevalent and serious problem faced by developers in their daily work. The survey conducted by Gruber and Fraser highlighted the need for further research and solutions to address this issue from both technical and psychological perspectives. With support tools, training resources, and continued efforts from researchers and tool developers, we can work towards minimizing the impact of flaky tests on software testing processes.

Created on 23 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.