Satellite Image and Machine Learning based Knowledge Extraction in the Poverty and Welfare Domain

AI-generated keywords: Transparency Interpretability Explainability AI Machine Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Recent advances in AI and machine learning have revolutionized the measurement of human development indicators, particularly asset-based poverty.
  • Satellite imagery and machine learning techniques can estimate poverty levels with similar accuracy as traditional methods.
  • There is interest in using this technology for scientific discovery and generating new knowledge in the field of poverty and welfare.
  • Transparency, interpretability, and explainability are three core elements needed to achieve scientific insights.
  • Existing literature shows that these core elements vary across studies and do not fully meet the requirements for scientific insights and discoveries.
  • Some papers demonstrate transparency by providing detailed information about their models, while others lack clarity in methodology.
  • Interpretability is often limited as researchers do not thoroughly discuss how different features impact their results or what changes in an image would alter the output.
  • Explainability plays a crucial role in supporting wider acceptance and dissemination of research findings.
  • Ethical considerations may arise when sharing data or final predictions.
  • Work needs to be done to ensure transparency, interpretability, and explainability within the field of estimating poverty using satellite imagery.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ola Hall, Mattias Ohlsson, Thortseinn Rögnvaldsson

17 pages
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning have created a step change in how to measure human development indicators, in particular asset based poverty. The combination of satellite imagery and machine learning has the capability to estimate poverty at a level similar to what is achieved with workhorse methods such as face-to-face interviews and household surveys. An increasingly important issue beyond static estimations is whether this technology can contribute to scientific discovery and consequently new knowledge in the poverty and welfare domain. A foundation for achieving scientific insights is domain knowledge, which in turn translates into explainability and scientific consistency. We review the literature focusing on three core elements relevant in this context: transparency, interpretability, and explainability and investigate how they relates to the poverty, machine learning and satellite imagery nexus. Our review of the field shows that the status of the three core elements of explainable machine learning (transparency, interpretability and domain knowledge) is varied and does not completely fulfill the requirements set up for scientific insights and discoveries. We argue that explainability is essential to support wider dissemination and acceptance of this research, and explainability means more than just interpretability.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.01068v1

Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning have revolutionized the measurement of human development indicators, particularly asset-based poverty. By combining satellite imagery and machine learning techniques, researchers are now able to estimate poverty levels with a similar accuracy as traditional methods such as face-to-face interviews and household surveys. However, beyond static estimations, there is a growing interest in whether this technology can contribute to scientific discovery and generate new knowledge in the field of poverty and welfare. To achieve scientific insights, it is crucial to have domain knowledge that translates into explainability and scientific consistency. In this review, the focus is on three core elements: transparency, interpretability, and explainability. Transparency refers to the ability to understand the inner workings of the models used in machine learning algorithms. Interpretability involves understanding how different features affect the output of these models. Explainability goes beyond interpretability by considering how well the results can be communicated and disseminated. The review of existing literature reveals that the status of these three core elements varies across studies and does not fully meet the requirements for scientific insights and discoveries. While some papers demonstrate transparency by providing detailed information about their models and parameters, others lack clarity in their methodology. Similarly, interpretability is often limited as researchers do not thoroughly discuss how different features impact their results or what changes in an image would alter the output. It is argued that explainability plays a crucial role in supporting wider acceptance and dissemination of research findings. Explainability encompasses more than just interpretability; it involves making all aspects of a study transparent so that other researchers can reproduce and explore the models for further analysis. However, ethical considerations may arise when sharing data or final predictions. Overall, while recent advancements in AI and machine learning have opened up new possibilities for estimating poverty using satellite imagery, there is still work to be done to ensure transparency, interpretability, and explainability within this field. By addressing these challenges, researchers can enhance scientific discovery and contribute to a deeper understanding of poverty and welfare.
Created on 28 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.