A quantitative assessment of the VO line list: Inaccuracies hamper high-resolution VO detections in exoplanet atmospheres
AI-generated Key Points
- Metal hydrides and oxides are important in hot-Jupiter exoplanet atmospheres
- Vanadium oxide (VO) is commonly observed in M-dwarf star spectra
- Previous studies detected VO in low-resolution spectrum of WASP-121b
- High-resolution detections of VO in WASP-121b have not been confirmed, possibly due to inaccuracies in the VO line list
- Authors quantitatively evaluate the VO line list to determine if inaccuracies hinder high-resolution detections
- Cross-correlation analysis applied to archival spectra from HARPS and CARMENES instruments obtained from M-dwarf stars
- Synthetic VO models injected into spectra for comparison with cross-correlation signals
- Inaccuracies in line list cause suppression of VO cross-correlation signals by approximately 2.1 times for complete line list and 1.1 times for reduced line list
- Reduced line list outperforms complete line list by approximately 1.8 times in recovering actual VO signal present in M-dwarf spectra
- Despite efforts to improve detectability, neither line list results in a VO detection in transmission spectrum of WASP-121b
Authors: S. de Regt, A. Y. Kesseli, I. A. G. Snellen, S. R. Merritt, K. L. Chubb
Abstract: Metal hydrides and oxides are important species in hot-Jupiters since they can affect their energy budgets and the thermal structure of their atmospheres. One such species is VO, which is prominent in stellar M-dwarf spectra. Evidence for VO has been found in the low-resolution transmission spectrum of WASP-121b, but this has not been confirmed at high resolution. It has been suggested that this is due to inaccuracies in its line list. In this paper, we quantitatively evaluate the VO line list and assess whether inaccuracies are responsible for the non-detections at high resolution in WASP-121b. Furthermore, we investigate whether the detectability can be improved by selecting only those lines associated with the most accurate quantum transitions. A cross-correlation analysis was applied to archival HARPS and CARMENES spectra of several M dwarfs. VO cross-correlation signals from the spectra were compared with those in which synthetic VO models were injected, providing an estimate of the ratio between the potential strength (in case of a perfect model) and the observed strength of the signal. This was repeated for the reduced model covering the most accurate quantum transitions. The findings were fed into injection and recovery tests of VO in a UVES transmission spectrum of WASP-121b. We find that inaccuracies cause VO cross-correlation signals in M-dwarf spectra to be suppressed by about a factor 2.1 and 1.1 for the complete and reduced line lists, respectively, corresponding to a reduced observing efficiency of a factor 4.3 and 1.2. The reduced line list outperforms the complete line list in recovering the actual VO signal in the M-dwarf spectra by about a factor of 1.8. Neither line list results in a VO detection in WASP-121b. Injection tests show that with the reduced efficiency of the line lists, the potential signal as seen at low resolution is not detectable in these data.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.