Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networks

AI-generated keywords: Physics-informed Neural Networks Causality Accuracy Complexity

AI-generated Key Points

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are used for simulating complex physical systems
PINN models have difficulty accurately simulating dynamical systems that exhibit multi-scale, chaotic or turbulent behavior
Researchers proposed a re-formulation of PINN loss functions that explicitly account for physical causality during model training
This modification introduced significant accuracy improvements and provided a practical quantitative mechanism for assessing the convergence of a PINN model
The modified PINNs demonstrated state-of-the-art numerical results across several benchmarks where existing formulations fail, including the chaotic Lorenz system, the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in the chaotic regime, and the Navier-Stokes equations in the turbulent regime
Respecting causality is fundamental to accurately simulating physical systems and overcoming challenges that currently limit the success of PINNs to relatively simple problems
Classical numerical methods typically discretize PDEs sequentially over time using algorithms that ensure full resolution at each time step before approximating subsequent steps
Respecting causality can significantly improve the accuracy and applicability of PINNs to problems with industrial complexity.
These findings could pave the way for further advancements in physics-informed machine learning techniques.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sifan Wang, Shyam Sankaran, Paris Perdikaris

arXiv: 2203.07404v1 - DOI (cs.LG)

35 pages, 27 figures, 4 tables

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: While the popularity of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) is steadily rising, to this date PINNs have not been successful in simulating dynamical systems whose solution exhibits multi-scale, chaotic or turbulent behavior. In this work we attribute this shortcoming to the inability of existing PINNs formulations to respect the spatio-temporal causal structure that is inherent to the evolution of physical systems. We argue that this is a fundamental limitation and a key source of error that can ultimately steer PINN models to converge towards erroneous solutions. We address this pathology by proposing a simple re-formulation of PINNs loss functions that can explicitly account for physical causality during model training. We demonstrate that this simple modification alone is enough to introduce significant accuracy improvements, as well as a practical quantitative mechanism for assessing the convergence of a PINNs model. We provide state-of-the-art numerical results across a series of benchmarks for which existing PINNs formulations fail, including the chaotic Lorenz system, the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in the chaotic regime, and the Navier-Stokes equations in the turbulent regime. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that PINNs have been successful in simulating such systems, introducing new opportunities for their applicability to problems of industrial complexity.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.07404v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have gained popularity in recent years as a promising tool for simulating complex physical systems. To address the issue of PINN models not accurately simulating dynamical systems that exhibit multi-scale, chaotic or turbulent behavior, a team of researchers proposed a simple re-formulation of PINN loss functions that explicitly account for physical causality during model training. This modification introduced significant accuracy improvements and provided a practical quantitative mechanism for assessing the convergence of a PINN model. The researchers demonstrated state-of-the-art numerical results across several benchmarks where existing PINN formulations fail, including the chaotic Lorenz system, the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in the chaotic regime, and the Navier-Stokes equations in the turbulent regime. The team argued that respecting causality is fundamental to accurately simulating physical systems and overcoming challenges that currently limit the success of PINNs to relatively simple problems. Physical systems possess an inherent causal structure that dictates how local changes in initial/boundary data are reflected in corresponding states at later times. Classical numerical methods typically discretize PDEs sequentially over time using algorithms that ensure full resolution at each time step before approximating subsequent steps. Overall, this work highlights how respecting causality can significantly improve the accuracy and applicability of PINNs to problems with industrial complexity. By introducing new opportunities for their use across various fields, these findings could pave the way for further advancements in physics-informed machine learning techniques.

- Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are used for simulating complex physical systems
- PINN models have difficulty accurately simulating dynamical systems that exhibit multi-scale, chaotic or turbulent behavior
- Researchers proposed a re-formulation of PINN loss functions that explicitly account for physical causality during model training
- This modification introduced significant accuracy improvements and provided a practical quantitative mechanism for assessing the convergence of a PINN model
- The modified PINNs demonstrated state-of-the-art numerical results across several benchmarks where existing formulations fail, including the chaotic Lorenz system, the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in the chaotic regime, and the Navier-Stokes equations in the turbulent regime
- Respecting causality is fundamental to accurately simulating physical systems and overcoming challenges that currently limit the success of PINNs to relatively simple problems
- Classical numerical methods typically discretize PDEs sequentially over time using algorithms that ensure full resolution at each time step before approximating subsequent steps
- Respecting causality can significantly improve the accuracy and applicability of PINNs to problems with industrial complexity.
- These findings could pave the way for further advancements in physics-informed machine learning techniques.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are used to simulate complex physical systems. Sometimes, PINN models have trouble accurately simulating systems that are very complicated or chaotic. Researchers came up with a new way to train PINN models that takes into account how things in the real world cause other things to happen. This new method made the models more accurate and better at predicting what would happen in different situations. The new and improved PINNs did really well on some difficult tests, like simulating chaotic systems and turbulent fluids. It's important for these models to respect causality, which means understanding how one thing leads to another in the real world. By doing this, we can make better predictions about how things will behave in complex systems. These findings could lead to even more improvements in physics-informed machine learning techniques.

Exploring the Benefits of Causality in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

The use of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) has grown significantly in recent years, as they offer a promising tool for simulating complex physical systems. However, existing PINN models have struggled to accurately simulate dynamical systems that exhibit multi-scale, chaotic or turbulent behavior. To address this issue, a team of researchers proposed a simple re-formulation of PINN loss functions that explicitly account for physical causality during model training. This modification introduced significant accuracy improvements and provided a practical quantitative mechanism for assessing the convergence of a PINN model.

Respecting Physical Causality

Physical systems possess an inherent causal structure that dictates how local changes in initial/boundary data are reflected in corresponding states at later times. Classical numerical methods typically discretize PDEs sequentially over time using algorithms that ensure full resolution at each time step before approximating subsequent steps. By introducing new opportunities for their use across various fields, these findings could pave the way for further advancements in physics-informed machine learning techniques.

State-of-the Art Numerical Results

The researchers demonstrated state-of-the art numerical results across several benchmarks where existing PINN formulations fail, including the chaotic Lorenz system, the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation in the chaotic regime, and the Navier–Stokes equations in the turbulent regime. The team argued that respecting causality is fundamental to accurately simulating physical systems and overcoming challenges that currently limit the success of PINNs to relatively simple problems.

Conclusion

Overall, this work highlights how respecting causality can significantly improve accuracy and applicability of PINNs to problems with industrial complexity by introducing new opportunities for their use across various fields; thus paving way for further advancements in physics informed machine learning techniques

Created on 31 Mar. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.