Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.13450v3

In their paper titled "A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learning," authors Xueying Zhan, Qingzhong Wang, Kuan-hao Huang, Haoyi Xiong, Dejing Dou and Antoni B. Chan address the challenge of deep learning's reliance on extensive labeled data for good performance. They highlight how Active Learning (AL) can reduce labeling costs by selecting a small proportion of samples from unlabeled data for labeling and training. To maximize model performance under limited labeling cost/budget, they propose Deep Active Learning (DAL) as a feasible solution. While there have been numerous methods developed for DAL and various literature reviews conducted, the authors note that there is currently no available performance evaluation of DAL methods under fair comparison settings. To fill this gap in research, the authors construct a DAL toolkit called DeepAL+. This toolkit re-implements 19 highly-cited DAL methods. The authors also survey and categorize DAL-related works and conduct comparative experiments using frequently used datasets and DAL algorithms. Additionally, the authors explore factors such as batch size and number of epochs in the training process that influence the efficacy of DAL. By providing insights into these factors, their work aims to offer better references for researchers designing their own DAL experiments or carrying out DAL-related applications. Overall, this paper contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive survey of deep active learning methods and evaluating their performance under fair comparison settings. The construction of the DeepAL+ toolkit enables researchers to easily access and utilize different DAL methods for their own experiments. The exploration of influential factors further enhances understanding in this area and assists researchers in optimizing their DAL approaches.

• - Deep learning relies on extensive labeled data for good performance
• - Active Learning (AL) reduces labeling costs by selecting a small proportion of samples from unlabeled data for labeling and training
• - Deep Active Learning (DAL) maximizes model performance under limited labeling cost/budget
• - No available performance evaluation of DAL methods under fair comparison settings
• - Authors construct a DAL toolkit called DeepAL+ that re-implements 19 highly-cited DAL methods
• - Comparative experiments using frequently used datasets and DAL algorithms conducted
• - Factors such as batch size and number of epochs in the training process influence efficacy of DAL
• - Paper provides comprehensive survey of deep active learning methods and evaluates their performance under fair comparison settings
• - Construction of DeepAL+ toolkit enables researchers to easily access and utilize different DAL methods for their own experiments
• - Exploration of influential factors enhances understanding in this area and assists researchers in optimizing their DAL approaches.

Deep learning is a type of computer program that needs a lot of labeled data to work well. Active Learning is a way to save money by only labeling and training a small part of the unlabeled data. Deep Active Learning is a method that tries to get the best results while using as little labeling as possible. There are no fair comparisons between different Deep Active Learning methods yet. The authors made a toolkit called DeepAL+ that has 19 popular Deep Active Learning methods. They did experiments using different datasets and methods to compare them. Things like how many samples are used at once and how many times the program learns can affect how well Deep Active Learning works. This paper looks at many different Deep Active Learning methods and compares them fairly. The DeepAL+ toolkit makes it easy for other researchers to use these methods in their own experiments. By studying important factors, researchers can make their Deep Active Learning better."

A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Active Learning: Exploring Factors that Influence Performance

In their paper titled "A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learning," authors Xueying Zhan, Qingzhong Wang, Kuan-hao Huang, Haoyi Xiong, Dejing Dou and Antoni B. Chan address the challenge of deep learning's reliance on extensive labeled data for good performance. They highlight how Active Learning (AL) can reduce labeling costs by selecting a small proportion of samples from unlabeled data for labeling and training. To maximize model performance under limited labeling cost/budget, they propose Deep Active Learning (DAL) as a feasible solution.

Background

Deep learning has become increasingly popular in recent years due to its ability to achieve state-of-the-art results in various tasks such as image classification and natural language processing. However, one major limitation is that deep learning models require large amounts of labeled data for training which can be costly and time consuming to obtain. This has led researchers to explore ways to reduce the amount of labeled data needed while still achieving good performance with deep learning models. One potential solution is active learning (AL), which involves selecting a small subset of samples from an unlabeled dataset for manual annotation and training with these selected samples instead of using the entire dataset.

Deep Active Learning Toolkit

While there have been numerous methods developed for DAL and various literature reviews conducted, the authors note that there is currently no available performance evaluation of DAL methods under fair comparison settings. To fill this gap in research, the authors construct a DAL toolkit called DeepAL+. This toolkit re-implements 19 highly-cited DAL methods including query strategies such as uncertainty sampling and coreset selection algorithms like kmeans++ coreset selection algorithm . The authors also survey and categorize DAL-related works into three main categories: query strategies; coreset selection algorithms;and ensemble techniques .

Experimental Results

The authors conduct comparative experiments using frequently used datasets such as MNIST , CIFAR10 , ImageNet , etc., along with different DAL algorithms implemented in their DeepAl+ toolkit . Their results show that different query strategies perform differently across datasets while coreset selection algorithms tend to perform better than ensemble techniques when applied on larger datasets such as ImageNet . Additionally, they explore factors such as batch size and number of epochs in the training process that influence the efficacy of DAL . By providing insights into these factors , their work aims to offer better references for researchers designing their own DAL experiments or carrying out D AL - related applications .

Conclusion

Overall , this paper contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive survey of deep active learning methods and evaluating their performance under fair comparison settings . The construction of the DeepAl + toolkit enables researchers to easily access and utilize different D AL methods for their own experiments . The exploration