Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2204.06372v1

The increased deployment of distributed energy generation and the integration of new, large electric loads such as electric vehicles and heat pumps pose challenges to the correct and reliable operation of low voltage distribution systems. In order to address potential problems, active management solutions have been proposed in the literature, which require distribution system models that include the phase connectivity of all consumers in the network. However, in practice, information on the phase connectivity is often unavailable. In this study, several voltage and power measurement-based phase identification methods from existing literature are implemented and compared. The comparison is conducted across different smart meter accuracy classes and smart meter penetration levels using publicly available data. Additionally, a novel method is proposed that utilizes ensemble learning and can combine data from different measurement campaigns. The results indicate that voltage data generally yields better results compared to power data from smart meters of the same accuracy class. Furthermore, if power data is also available, the novel ensemble method can improve the accuracy of phase identification obtained from voltage data alone. The paper highlights that underground cables and lack of color-coding pose additional challenges for phase identification in low voltage distribution systems. Various data-driven approaches have been proposed in literature, including field measurement-based methods using phasor measurement units (PMUs) between consumers and transformers. However, PMUs are expensive and unlikely to be widely available at low voltage levels in the near future. Smart meters offer a more realistic option for practical implementation. Section III presents the mathematical formulation of the phase identification methods used in this study, including the novel ensemble learning method. Section IV illustrates the performance of different methods under various scenarios. Finally, conclusions are drawn based on the findings. Overall, this study contributes to addressing challenges related to accurate phase identification in low voltage distribution systems by implementing and comparing existing methods based on smart meter data.

• - Increased deployment of distributed energy generation and integration of new electric loads pose challenges to low voltage distribution systems
• - Active management solutions have been proposed in the literature
• - Distribution system models need to include phase connectivity of all consumers
• - Information on phase connectivity is often unavailable in practice
• - Voltage and power measurement-based phase identification methods are implemented and compared
• - Voltage data generally yields better results compared to power data from smart meters
• - Ensemble learning method can improve accuracy when power data is available alongside voltage data
• - Underground cables and lack of color-coding pose additional challenges for phase identification
• - Phasor measurement units (PMUs) are expensive and unlikely to be widely available at low voltage levels in the near future
• - Smart meters offer a more realistic option for practical implementation
• - Mathematical formulation of phase identification methods is presented in Section III
• - Performance of different methods under various scenarios is illustrated in Section IV
• - Conclusions drawn based on the findings contribute to addressing challenges related to accurate phase identification in low voltage distribution systems

Key points1. Using more renewable energy sources and connecting new devices to the electricity grid can cause problems for smaller power systems. 2. Researchers have suggested ways to actively manage these challenges. 3. Models of the power system need to show how all customers are connected to different parts of the system. 4. It is often difficult to find out how customers are connected in real life. 5. Different methods for figuring out how customers are connected have been tested, with voltage data being more accurate than power data. Definitions- Distributed energy generation: Producing electricity from many small sources, like solar panels or wind turbines, instead of one big power plant. - Low voltage distribution systems: The part of the electricity grid that delivers power to homes and businesses at a lower voltage level. - Active management solutions: Ways to actively control and balance the flow of electricity in the grid. - Phase connectivity: How each customer is connected to different parts (phases) of the electricity grid. - Ensemble learning method: A way of combining multiple methods or models together to get better results. - Phasor measurement units (PMUs): Devices that measure electrical parameters like voltage and current very accurately and quickly.

The Challenges of Accurate Phase Identification in Low Voltage Distribution Systems

As the deployment of distributed energy generation and integration of new, large electric loads such as electric vehicles and heat pumps increase, the correct and reliable operation of low voltage distribution systems is becoming increasingly challenging. To address potential problems, active management solutions have been proposed which require accurate models that include phase connectivity information for all consumers in the network. However, this information is often unavailable in practice. In order to overcome this challenge, researchers have proposed several data-driven approaches using field measurement-based methods with phasor measurement units (PMUs) between consumers and transformers. Unfortunately, PMUs are expensive and unlikely to be widely available at low voltage levels anytime soon. Smart meters offer a more realistic option for practical implementation due to their lower cost and wider availability. This study contributes to addressing challenges related to accurate phase identification in low voltage distribution systems by implementing existing methods based on smart meter data as well as proposing a novel ensemble learning method that can combine data from different measurement campaigns.

Implementation & Comparison of Existing Methods

This research paper implements several voltage and power measurement-based phase identification methods from existing literature which are then compared across different smart meter accuracy classes and penetration levels using publicly available data sets. Additionally, a novel method is proposed that utilizes ensemble learning techniques which can improve the accuracy of phase identification obtained from voltage data alone when combined with power data from smart meters of the same accuracy class. The results indicate that voltage data generally yields better results compared to power data from smart meters of the same accuracy class while underground cables pose additional challenges for phase identification in low voltage distribution systems regardless of approach used or type/accuracy level of meter employed.

Mathematical Formulation & Performance Analysis

Section III presents the mathematical formulation behind each one of these methods including details about how they work as well as their limitations under various scenarios while Section IV illustrates their performance when applied under different conditions such as varying degrees/levels/classes/types etc..

Conclusion

Overall, this study highlights how various approaches can be used to accurately identify phases within low voltage distribution networks using both existing methods based on smart meter readings as well as a novel ensemble learning technique capable combining multiple sources or types (voltage & power) into one unified model for improved accuracy even when dealing with underground cables or lack thereof color-coding issues common among such networks .