Surrogate Assisted Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimisation applied to a Pressure Swing Adsorption system
AI-generated Key Points
- Chemical plant design and optimization often require computationally expensive mathematical formulations and simulation models
- Machine learning surrogate models can be used as substitutes for these expensive models during optimization processes
- This paper explores Surrogate Assisted Genetic Algorithms (SA-GA) in more complex variants of chemical plant design and optimization problems
- The study focuses on including parallel and feedback components in the original plant design, adding to the complexity of the system
- A novel extension called Surrogate Assisted NSGA-2 (SA-NSGA) is proposed to address this challenge
- The effectiveness of this approach is tested on a well-known case, the Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) system
- Genetic Algorithms provide an effective framework for optimizing complex chemical plant systems in both single and multi-objective scenarios
- Random Forest surrogate assisted Evolutionary Algorithms can handle increasingly complex chemical systems with parallel and feedback components
- Combining a Genetic Algorithm framework with Machine Learning Surrogate models leads to significant computational efficiency improvements
- The proposed approach achieves a speedup of 1.7 - 1.84 times for increased complexity examples and a 2.7 times speedup for the Pressure Swing Adsorption system
- This research highlights the computational advantages obtained by using a GA combined with Machine Learning Surrogate models for chemical plant design and optimization
- Random Forest SA-GA and SA-NSGA algorithms are flexible and robust, suitable for handling more complex multi-objective systems
- This surrogate-assisted optimization approach should be further verified and tested within industry settings
Authors: Liezl Stander, Matthew Woolway, Terence L. Van Zyl
Abstract: Chemical plant design and optimisation have proven challenging due to the complexity of these real-world systems. The resulting complexity translates into high computational costs for these systems' mathematical formulations and simulation models. Research has illustrated the benefits of using machine learning surrogate models as substitutes for computationally expensive models during optimisation. This paper extends recent research into optimising chemical plant design and operation. The study further explores Surrogate Assisted Genetic Algorithms (SA-GA) in more complex variants of the original plant design and optimisation problems, such as the inclusion of parallel and feedback components. The novel extension to the original algorithm proposed in this study, Surrogate Assisted NSGA-\Romannum{2} (SA-NSGA), was tested on a popular literature case, the Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) system. We further provide extensive experimentation, comparing various meta-heuristic optimisation techniques and numerous machine learning models as surrogates. The results for both sets of systems illustrate the benefits of using Genetic Algorithms as an optimisation framework for complex chemical plant system design and optimisation for both single and multi-objective scenarios. We confirm that Random Forest surrogate assisted Evolutionary Algorithms can be scaled to increasingly complex chemical systems with parallel and feedback components. We further find that combining a Genetic Algorithm framework with Machine Learning Surrogate models as a substitute for long-running simulation models yields significant computational efficiency improvements, 1.7 - 1.84 times speedup for the increased complexity examples and a 2.7 times speedup for the Pressure Swing Adsorption system.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.