The suitability of agricultural land for specific management practices is a critical factor in ensuring sustainable and resilient agriculture against the impacts of climate change. Recent advances in causal machine learning have enabled the estimation of intervention impacts on an outcome of interest, based on observed characteristics. In this study, the authors introduce a data-driven framework that leverages earth observations to assess agricultural land suitability as a geospatial impact assessment problem. The estimated effects of agricultural practices on agroecosystems serve as a land suitability score and guide decision-making. The authors formulate this approach as a causal machine learning task and demonstrate its potential for agricultural planning in a changing climate. Specifically, they extract information about two key agricultural management practices - "crop rotation" and "landscape crop diversity" - from crop type maps, account for climate and land use data, and use double machine learning to estimate their heterogeneous effect on Net Primary Productivity (NPP) within the Flanders region of Belgium from 2010 to 2020. The results show that while the effect of crop rotation was insignificant, landscape crop diversity had a small negative effect on NPP. The authors also observe considerable effect heterogeneity in space for both practices and analyze it further. Overall, this study highlights the potential benefits of using causal machine learning to assess agricultural land suitability and guide decision-making towards more sustainable agriculture practices in the face of climate change.

• - Agricultural land suitability is critical for sustainable and resilient agriculture against climate change impacts
• - Causal machine learning can estimate intervention impacts on an outcome of interest based on observed characteristics
• - A data-driven framework leverages earth observations to assess agricultural land suitability as a geospatial impact assessment problem
• - Estimated effects of agricultural practices serve as a land suitability score and guide decision-making
• - The approach is formulated as a causal machine learning task and demonstrates potential for agricultural planning in a changing climate
• - Crop rotation and landscape crop diversity were analyzed using double machine learning to estimate their effect on Net Primary Productivity (NPP) within the Flanders region of Belgium from 2010 to 2020
• - Results show that while crop rotation had an insignificant effect, landscape crop diversity had a small negative effect on NPP with considerable effect heterogeneity in space for both practices.
• - This study highlights the potential benefits of using causal machine learning to assess agricultural land suitability and guide decision-making towards more sustainable agriculture practices in the face of climate change.

1. Farmers need to use land that is good for growing crops and can handle changes in the weather. 2. Scientists can use a special kind of math to figure out how different farming methods affect the crops. 3. They look at pictures of the Earth from space to help them decide which land is best for farming. 4. The math helps farmers make better choices about what to grow and how to take care of their land. 5. This helps make sure we have enough food even when the weather is changing. Definitions: 1. Agricultural land suitability: finding the right land for growing crops. 2. Causal machine learning: using math to understand cause-and-effect relationships.

Data-Driven Framework for Assessing Agricultural Land Suitability

The suitability of agricultural land for specific management practices is a critical factor in ensuring sustainable and resilient agriculture against the impacts of climate change. Recent advances in causal machine learning have enabled the estimation of intervention impacts on an outcome of interest, based on observed characteristics. In this study, the authors introduce a data-driven framework that leverages earth observations to assess agricultural land suitability as a geospatial impact assessment problem.

Formulating Causal Machine Learning Task

The estimated effects of agricultural practices on agroecosystems serve as a land suitability score and guide decision-making. The authors formulate this approach as a causal machine learning task and demonstrate its potential for agricultural planning in a changing climate. Specifically, they extract information about two key agricultural management practices - "crop rotation" and "landscape crop diversity" - from crop type maps, account for climate and land use data, and use double machine learning to estimate their heterogeneous effect on Net Primary Productivity (NPP) within the Flanders region of Belgium from 2010 to 2020.

Results Show Insignificant Effect Of Crop Rotation

The results show that while the effect of crop rotation was insignificant, landscape crop diversity had a small negative effect on NPP. The authors also observe considerable effect heterogeneity in space for both practices and analyze it further.

Conclusion: Potential Benefits Of Using Causal Machine Learning To Guide Decision Making Towards More Sustainable Agriculture Practices In Face Of Climate Change

"Overall, this study highlights the potential benefits of using causal machine learning to assess agricultural land suitability and guide decision-making towards more sustainable agriculture practices in the face of climate change."

. This research paper provides an innovative approach to assessing agricultural land suitability by leveraging earth observations through causal machine learning. By extracting information about two key management practices – “crop rotation” and “landscape crop diversity” – from crop type maps, accounting for climate and land use data, then using double machine learning to estimate their heterogeneous effects on Net Primary Productivity (NPP), researchers were able to identify areas with suitable conditions for different types of farming activities. Results showed that while there was an insignificant effect associated with crop rotation, landscape crop diversity had a small negative effect on NPP; however there was considerable heterogeneity observed between locations when it came to both practices. Ultimately this research demonstrates how utilizing such methods can help inform decisions related to sustainable agriculture practice implementation in light of ongoing changes due to climate change.