One Policy is Enough: Parallel Exploration with a Single Policy is Near-Optimal for Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated keywords: Parallel Exploration Reward-Free RL Linear MDPs Two-Player Zero-Sum Games Near-Minimax Optimal

AI-generated Key Points

  • Investigating benefits of parallel exploration in reward-free RL in linear MDPs and two-player zero-sum MGs
  • Using a single policy to guide exploration across all agents instead of diverse set of policies
  • Achieving almost linear speedup compared to fully sequential exploration in all cases
  • Near-minimax optimal for linear MDPs in the reward-free setting
  • Single policy is sufficient and provably near optimal for incorporating parallelism during exploration phase
  • Raising open questions about theoretical justifications and potential advantages of more intricate coordinated exploration strategies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pedro Cisneros-Velarde, Boxiang Lyu, Sanmi Koyejo, Mladen Kolar

50 pages
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Although parallelism has been extensively used in reinforcement learning (RL), the quantitative effects of parallel exploration are not well understood theoretically. We study the benefits of simple parallel exploration for reward-free RL in linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) and two-player zero-sum Markov games (MGs). In contrast to the existing literature, which focuses on approaches that encourage agents to explore a diverse set of policies, we show that using a single policy to guide exploration across all agents is sufficient to obtain an almost-linear speedup in all cases compared to their fully sequential counterpart. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this simple procedure is near-minimax optimal in the reward-free setting for linear MDPs. From a practical perspective, our paper shows that a single policy is sufficient and provably near-optimal for incorporating parallelism during the exploration phase.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.15891v3

In this paper, the authors investigate the benefits of parallel exploration in reward-free reinforcement learning (RL) in linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) and two-player zero-sum Markov games (MGs). They focus on using a single policy to guide exploration across all agents instead of encouraging them to explore a diverse set of policies. The authors demonstrate that this simple approach can achieve an almost linear speedup compared to fully sequential exploration in all cases. Furthermore, they show that this procedure is near-minimax optimal for linear MDPs in the reward-free setting. From a practical perspective, the paper highlights that a single policy is sufficient and provably near optimal for incorporating parallelism during the exploration phase. The authors conclude by raising open questions regarding the theoretical justifications and potential advantages of more intricate coordinated exploration strategies compared to their simplistic approach.
Created on 04 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.