Beyond spectral gap: The role of the topology in decentralized learning

AI-generated keywords: Data-parallel optimization Machine Learning Sparse Graphs Effective Number of Neighbors Consensus

AI-generated Key Points

  • Data-parallel optimization of machine learning models
  • Collaboration among workers to improve model estimates
  • More accurate gradients for larger learning rates and faster optimization
  • Consideration of decentralized communication over a sparse graph
  • Existing theory fails to predict empirical performance and explain collaboration benefits
  • Comprehensive understanding of sparsely-connected distributed optimization with shared data distribution
  • Analysis of quadratic toy problem showing averaging enables larger learning rate
  • Introduction of "effective number of neighbors" concept for predictive graph performance
  • Convergence proofs for convex and strongly convex objectives using entire graph spectrum
  • Emphasis on achieving consensus between workers rather than global consensus
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Thijs Vogels, Hadrien Hendrikx, Martin Jaggi

Under review
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In data-parallel optimization of machine learning models, workers collaborate to improve their estimates of the model: more accurate gradients allow them to use larger learning rates and optimize faster. We consider the setting in which all workers sample from the same dataset, and communicate over a sparse graph (decentralized). In this setting, current theory fails to capture important aspects of real-world behavior. First, the 'spectral gap' of the communication graph is not predictive of its empirical performance in (deep) learning. Second, current theory does not explain that collaboration enables larger learning rates than training alone. In fact, it prescribes smaller learning rates, which further decrease as graphs become larger, failing to explain convergence in infinite graphs. This paper aims to paint an accurate picture of sparsely-connected distributed optimization when workers share the same data distribution. We quantify how the graph topology influences convergence in a quadratic toy problem and provide theoretical results for general smooth and (strongly) convex objectives. Our theory matches empirical observations in deep learning, and accurately describes the relative merits of different graph topologies.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.03093v1

This paper focuses on the data-parallel optimization of machine learning models, where workers collaborate to improve their estimates of the model by sharing information. The goal is to achieve more accurate gradients, which in turn allow for larger learning rates and faster optimization. The authors specifically consider the scenario where all workers sample from the same dataset and communicate over a sparse graph (decentralized). The existing theory in this field fails to capture important aspects of real-world behavior. Firstly, it does not accurately predict the empirical performance of communication graphs in deep learning based on their spectral gap. Secondly, it does not explain why collaboration enables larger learning rates compared to training alone. In fact, current theory suggests smaller learning rates that further decrease as graphs become larger, failing to explain convergence in infinite graphs. To address these limitations, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of sparsely-connected distributed optimization when workers share the same data distribution. The authors quantify how the graph topology influences convergence by analyzing a quadratic toy problem that mimics the initial phase of deep learning. They show that averaging enables a larger learning rate in this context. Based on these insights, the authors propose a problem-independent concept called the "effective number of neighbors" in a graph. This notion takes into account time-varying topologies and infinite graphs and is predictive of a graph's empirical performance in both convex and deep learning scenarios. Furthermore, the paper provides convergence proofs for convex and strongly convex objectives that rely on considering the entire spectrum of the graph rather than just its spectral gap. The analysis emphasizes achieving consensus between workers rather than enforcing global consensus. Overall, this study bridges theoretical understanding with empirical observations in deep learning and accurately describes the relative merits of different graph topologies for distributed optimization tasks.
Created on 08 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.