A Transparency Index Framework for AI in Education

AI-generated keywords: Transparency Index

AI-generated Key Points

  • The Transparency Index framework aims to develop transparent AI systems for real-world educational scenarios.
  • No previous work has been done on developing transparent AI systems for education.
  • The framework was co-designed with different stakeholders of AI in education, including educators, ed-tech experts, and AI practitioners.
  • Transparency considerations are embedded in the entire AI development process from the data collection stage until the AI system is deployed in the real world and iteratively improved.
  • Transparency enables implementation of other ethical dimensions in education like interpretability, accountability, and safety.
  • The framework provides different aspects of the data processing stage that AI practitioners need to document and details of models used for decision-making can be documented and shared publicly by ed-tech companies developing AI-powered products to enable reproducible research.
  • All three stakeholders found transparency through the Transparency Index framework useful.
  • The authors created this framework based on popular frameworks for documentation, robustness, and reproducibility identified during a literature review across three stages: data processing stage; machine learning modelling stage; deployment and iterative improvements stage.
  • The authors conclude by discussing the importance of transparency in developing AI-powered educational technologies and proposing an index framework for its conceptualization for AI in education.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Muhammad Ali Chaudhry, Mutlu Cukurova, Rose Luckin

17 pages, 4 Figures, 2 Tables
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Numerous AI ethics checklists and frameworks have been proposed focusing on different dimensions of ethical AI such as fairness, explainability, and safety. Yet, no such work has been done on developing transparent AI systems for real-world educational scenarios. This paper presents a Transparency Index framework that has been iteratively co-designed with different stakeholders of AI in education, including educators, ed-tech experts, and AI practitioners. We map the requirements of transparency for different categories of stakeholders of AI in education and demonstrate that transparency considerations are embedded in the entire AI development process from the data collection stage until the AI system is deployed in the real world and iteratively improved. We also demonstrate how transparency enables the implementation of other ethical AI dimensions in Education like interpretability, accountability, and safety. In conclusion, we discuss the directions for future research in this newly emerging field. The main contribution of this study is that it highlights the importance of transparency in developing AI-powered educational technologies and proposes an index framework for its conceptualization for AI in education.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.03220v1

This paper introduces the Transparency Index framework, which aims to develop transparent AI systems for real-world educational scenarios. While numerous AI ethics checklists and frameworks have been proposed focusing on different dimensions of ethical AI such as fairness, explainability, and safety, no such work has been done on developing transparent AI systems for education. The Transparency Index framework was iteratively co-designed with different stakeholders of AI in education, including educators, ed-tech experts, and AI practitioners. The framework maps the requirements of transparency for different categories of stakeholders of AI in education and demonstrates that transparency considerations are embedded in the entire AI development process from the data collection stage until the AI system is deployed in the real world and iteratively improved. The authors highlight how transparency enables the implementation of other ethical dimensions in education like interpretability, accountability, and safety. For instance, it's important to document thoroughly the data that an AI system is trained on because this training data plays a significant role in determining how an AI system would work expectedly. The Transparency Index framework provides different aspects of the data processing stage that AI practitioners need to document. Additionally, details of models used for decision-making can be documented and shared publicly by ed-tech companies developing AI-powered products to enable reproducible research. While some researchers have argued against complete transparency like making code public due to concerns about hindering innovation or sharing trade secrets that provide a competitive edge over others, all three stakeholders found transparency through the Transparency Index framework useful. Educators as users of these products believed transparency helped them understand their products better while developers and providers believed it made them accountable for their work. The authors created this framework based on popular frameworks for documentation, robustness, and reproducibility identified during a literature review across three stages: data processing stage; machine learning modelling stage; deployment and iterative improvements stage. They then applied these frameworks during the development of an educational tool using domain-agnostic frameworks for educational settings to identify gaps. The authors conclude by discussing the importance of transparency in developing AI-powered educational technologies and proposing an index framework for its conceptualization for AI in education.
Created on 21 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.