Insurance pricing with hierarchically structured data: An illustration with a workers' compensation insurance portfolio
Authors: Bavo D. C. Campo, Katrien Antonio
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the use of predictive modeling techniques to assess loss costs on a contract as a function of observable risk characteristics.
- State-of-the-art statistical and machine learning methods are not well equipped to handle hierarchically structured risk factors with a large number of levels.
- The paper demonstrates the construction of a data-driven insurance pricing model when hierarchically structured risk factors, both contract-specific and externally collected ones, are available.
- The study focuses on the pricing of a workers' compensation insurance product using three different models: hierarchical credibility model, Ohlsson's combination of a generalized linear and hierarchical credibility model, and mixed models.
- The authors compare the predictive performance of these models and evaluate the effect of distributional assumptions on the target variable by comparing linear mixed models with Tweedie generalized linear mixed models.
- For their case-study, the Tweedie distribution is well suited to model and predict the loss cost on a contract.
- Incorporating contract-specific risk factors in the predictive model improves performance and allows for improved risk differentiation in their workers' compensation insurance portfolio.
- This paper provides valuable insights into how actuaries can effectively use predictive modeling techniques to assess loss costs on contracts while accounting for hierarchically structured risk factors.
- The findings have important implications for insurers looking to improve their pricing strategies and better manage risks associated with complex insurance products like workers' compensation.
Abstract: Actuaries use predictive modeling techniques to assess the loss cost on a contract as a function of observable risk characteristics. State-of-the-art statistical and machine learning methods are not well equipped to handle hierarchically structured risk factors with a large number of levels. In this paper, we demonstrate the construction of a data-driven insurance pricing model when hierarchically structured risk factors, contract-specific as well as externally collected risk factors are available. We examine the pricing of a workers' compensation insurance product with a hierarchical credibility model (Jewell, 1975), Ohlsson's combination of a generalized linear and a hierarchical credibility model (Ohlsson, 2008) and mixed models. We compare the predictive performance of these models and evaluate the effect of the distributional assumption on the target variable by comparing linear mixed models with Tweedie generalized linear mixed models. For our case-study the Tweedie distribution is well suited to model and predict the loss cost on a contract. Moreover, incorporating contract-specific risk factors in the predictive model improves the performance and allows for a improved risk differentiation in our workers' compensation insurance portfolio.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.