Hubble Asteroid Hunter: II. Identifying strong gravitational lenses in HST images with crowdsourcing
AI-generated Key Points
- The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) archives have high-resolution images that can be used to find strong gravitational lenses.
- Strong lenses can be found by coincidence in other HST observations, not just in targeted programs.
- Crowdsourcing on the Hubble Asteroid Hunter citizen science project was used to identify non-targeted strong gravitational lenses in almost two decades of images from the ESA it Hubble Space Telescope archive (eHST).
- After visually inspecting 2354 objects tagged by citizen scientists as strong lenses, the authors report the detection of 252 strong gravitational lens candidates that were not primary targets of the HST observations.
- Of these candidates, 198 are new and not previously reported by other studies, consisting of 45 A grades, 74 B grades and 79 C grades. The majority are galaxy-galaxy configurations.
- The newly detected lenses are on average 1.3 magnitudes fainter than previous HST searches.
- Crowdsourcing is a robust method for performing visual detection of strong lenses and shows that volunteers can detect classical lenses as well as outliers such as exotic lens configurations after receiving proper training and knowledge transfer.
- Combining artificial intelligence methods and crowdsourcing for the detection of strong lenses has strong potential to produce reliable catalogs in shorter timescales and detect outliers such as exotic lenses.
- This study demonstrates the power of crowdsourcing in visually identifying strong lenses and benefits exploring large archival datasets spanning decades in time to expand research horizons further into future missions like Euclid or JWST.
Authors: Emily O. Garvin, Sandor Kruk, Claude Cornen, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Raoul Cañameras, Bruno Merín
Abstract: The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) archives constitute a rich dataset of high resolution images to mine for strong gravitational lenses. While many HST programs specifically target strong lenses, they can also be present by coincidence in other HST observations. We aim to identify non-targeted strong gravitational lenses in almost two decades of images from the ESA it Hubble Space Telescope archive (eHST), without any prior selection on the lens properties. We used crowdsourcing on the Hubble Asteroid Hunter (HAH) citizen science project to identify strong lenses, alongside asteroid trails, in publicly available large field-of-view HST images. We visually inspected 2354 objects tagged by citizen scientists as strong lenses to clean the sample and identify the genuine lenses. We report the detection of 252 strong gravitational lens candidates, which were not the primary targets of the HST observations. 198 of them are new, not previously reported by other studies, consisting of 45 A grades, 74 B grades and 79 C grades. The majority are galaxy-galaxy configurations. The newly detected lenses are, on average, 1.3 magnitudes fainter than previous HST searches. This sample of strong lenses with high resolution HST imaging is ideal to follow-up with spectroscopy, for lens modelling and scientific analyses. This paper presents an unbiased search of lenses, which enabled us to find a high variety of lens configurations, including exotic lenses. We demonstrate the power of crowdsourcing in visually identifying strong lenses and the benefits of exploring large archival datasets. This study shows the potential of using crowdsourcing in combination with artificial intelligence for the detection and validation of strong lenses in future large-scale surveys such as ESA's future mission Euclid or in JWST archival images.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.