Quantitative Stock Investment by Routing Uncertainty-Aware Trading Experts: A Multi-Task Learning Approach

AI-generated keywords: Quantitative Investment

AI-generated Key Points

  • Quantitative investment relies on accurate stock prediction and profitable investment decision making
  • Deep learning methods have shown promise in capturing trading opportunities but are sensitive to random seeds and network initialization
  • Existing works have limitations: a gap between accurate predictions and profitable strategies, and reliance on individual predictors without considering model uncertainty
  • The authors propose a two-stage mixture-of-experts framework called AlphaMix for quantitative investment
  • AlphaMix optimizes multiple independent trading experts using an uncertainty-aware loss function in Stage one
  • Neural routers are trained to dynamically deploy these experts based on their performance in Stage two, mimicking the workflow of successful trading firms
  • AlphaMix can be applied to various backbone network architectures with consistent performance gains
  • Extensive experiments on real-world data from US and China markets show that AlphaMix outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in four financial criteria
  • Figure 3 illustrates the bottom-up hierarchical trading strategy design workflow in real-world trading companies, highlighting how AlphaMix aligns with this workflow
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shuo Sun, Rundong Wang, Bo An

arXiv: 2207.07578v1 - DOI (q-fin.TR)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Quantitative investment is a fundamental financial task that highly relies on accurate stock prediction and profitable investment decision making. Despite recent advances in deep learning (DL) have shown stellar performance on capturing trading opportunities in the stochastic stock market, we observe that the performance of existing DL methods is sensitive to random seeds and network initialization. To design more profitable DL methods, we analyze this phenomenon and find two major limitations of existing works. First, there is a noticeable gap between accurate financial predictions and profitable investment strategies. Second, investment decisions are made based on only one individual predictor without consideration of model uncertainty, which is inconsistent with the workflow in real-world trading firms. To tackle these two limitations, we first reformulate quantitative investment as a multi-task learning problem. Later on, we propose AlphaMix, a novel two-stage mixture-of-experts (MoE) framework for quantitative investment to mimic the efficient bottom-up trading strategy design workflow of successful trading firms. In Stage one, multiple independent trading experts are jointly optimized with an individual uncertainty-aware loss function. In Stage two, we train neural routers (corresponding to the role of a portfolio manager) to dynamically deploy these experts on an as-needed basis. AlphaMix is also a universal framework that is applicable to various backbone network architectures with consistent performance gains. Through extensive experiments on long-term real-world data spanning over five years on two of the most influential financial markets (US and China), we demonstrate that AlphaMix significantly outperforms many state-of-the-art baselines in terms of four financial criteria.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.07578v1

Quantitative investment is a crucial financial task that relies on accurate stock prediction and profitable investment decision making. While deep learning (DL) methods have shown promising results in capturing trading opportunities in the stochastic stock market, their performance is often sensitive to random seeds and network initialization. In order to address this limitation and design more profitable DL methods, the authors of this paper analyze the phenomenon and identify two major limitations of existing works. Firstly, there is a noticeable gap between accurate financial predictions and profitable investment strategies. This means that even if DL models can accurately predict stock movements, it does not necessarily translate into profitable investment decisions. Secondly, existing approaches make investment decisions based on only one individual predictor without considering model uncertainty. This approach is inconsistent with the workflow followed by real-world trading firms. To overcome these limitations, the authors propose a novel two-stage mixture-of-experts (MoE) framework called AlphaMix for quantitative investment. In Stage one, multiple independent trading experts are jointly optimized using an individual uncertainty-aware loss function. This allows for better alignment between accurate predictions and profitable investment strategies. In Stage two, neural routers are trained to dynamically deploy these experts based on their performance on an as-needed basis. This mimics the efficient bottom-up trading strategy design workflow followed by successful trading firms. AlphaMix is a universal framework that can be applied to various backbone network architectures with consistent performance gains. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of AlphaMix through extensive experiments on long-term real-world data spanning over five years from two influential financial markets - US and China. They show that AlphaMix significantly outperforms many state-of-the-art baselines in terms of four financial criteria. The paper also provides additional context through figures such as Figure 3, which illustrates the bottom-up hierarchical trading strategy design workflow in real-world trading companies. It highlights how AlphaMix aligns with this workflow to enhance quantitative stock investment. Overall, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the limitations of existing DL methods in quantitative investment and proposes a novel framework, AlphaMix, to address these limitations.
Created on 24 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.