Conformal Risk Control

Authors: Anastasios N. Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Adam Fisch, Lihua Lei, Tal Schuster

Code available at https://github.com/aangelopoulos/conformal-risk
AI-generated keywords: Conformal Risk Control Split Conformal Prediction Coverage Guarantee Computer Vision Natural Language Processing

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper introduces an extension of conformal prediction for controlling the expected value of any monotone loss function
  • The algorithm builds upon split conformal prediction and includes a coverage guarantee
  • Similar to traditional conformal prediction, the proposed procedure is accurate up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor
  • Worked examples in computer vision and natural language processing demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm
  • The approach can be used to bound metrics such as false negative rate, graph distance, and token-level F1-score
  • The paper expands on conformal prediction techniques and introduces a method for controlling different loss functions' expected values
  • Practical applications in computer vision and natural language processing highlight the potential usefulness of this approach in real-world scenarios
  • Suitable for use with large datasets due to its accuracy up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We extend conformal prediction to control the expected value of any monotone loss function. The algorithm generalizes split conformal prediction together with its coverage guarantee. Like conformal prediction, the conformal risk control procedure is tight up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor. Worked examples from computer vision and natural language processing demonstrate the usage of our algorithm to bound the false negative rate, graph distance, and token-level F1-score.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Aug. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.02814v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Conformal Risk Control" introduces an extension of conformal prediction that allows for the control of the expected value of any monotone loss function. The algorithm presented in the paper builds upon split conformal prediction and includes a coverage guarantee. Similar to traditional conformal prediction, the proposed conformal risk control procedure is accurate up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their algorithm through worked examples in computer vision and natural language processing. Specifically, they showcase how their approach can be used to bound various metrics such as the false negative rate, graph distance, and token-level F1-score. Overall, this paper provides a valuable contribution by expanding on conformal prediction techniques and introducing a method for controlling the expected value of different loss functions. The practical applications demonstrated in computer vision and natural language processing highlight the potential usefulness of this approach in real-world scenarios. Moreover, its accuracy up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor makes it suitable for use with large datasets.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.