Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Model

AI-generated keywords: Few-shot Learning Retrieval Augmented Language Model Large Language Models Knowledge-intensive Tasks Natural Language Processing

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Few-shot learning with retrieval augmented language model
  • Large language models in few-shot learning scenarios
  • Knowledge-intensive tasks like question answering and fact checking
  • Atlas: meticulously designed and pre-trained retrieval augmented language model
  • Achieving over 42% accuracy on Natural Questions using just 64 examples
  • Outperforming a model with 540 billion parameters by 3%
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gautier Izacard, Patrick Lewis, Maria Lomeli, Lucas Hosseini, Fabio Petroni, Timo Schick, Jane Yu, Armand Joulin, Sebastian Riedel, Edouard Grave

Abstract: Large language models have shown impressive few-shot results on a wide range of tasks. However, when knowledge is key for such results, as is the case for tasks such as question answering and fact checking, massive parameter counts to store knowledge seem to be needed. Retrieval augmented models are known to excel at knowledge intensive tasks without the need for as many parameters, but it is unclear whether they work in few-shot settings. In this work we present Atlas, a carefully designed and pre-trained retrieval augmented language model able to learn knowledge intensive tasks with very few training examples. We perform evaluations on a wide range of tasks, including MMLU, KILT and NaturalQuestions, and study the impact of the content of the document index, showing that it can easily be updated. Notably, Atlas reaches over 42\% accuracy on Natural Questions using only 64 examples, outperforming a 540B parameters model by 3% despite having 50x fewer parameters.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.03299v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Model," authors Gautier Izacard, Patrick Lewis, Maria Lomeli, Lucas Hosseini, Fabio Petroni, Timo Schick, Jane Yu, Armand Joulin, Sebastian Riedel, and Edouard Grave explore the capabilities of large language models in few-shot learning scenarios. They highlight that while these models have demonstrated impressive results across various tasks,<kg>few-shot learning</kg>, <kg>retrieval augmented language model</kg>, and <kg>large language models</kg>, knowledge-intensive tasks like question answering and fact checking often require a substantial number of parameters to store relevant information. To address this challenge,<kg>knowledge-intensive tasks</kg>, the authors introduce Atlas,<kg>meticulously designed and pre-trained retrieval augmented language model</kg>, that excels at learning knowledge-intensive tasks with minimal training examples. Through evaluations on tasks such as MMLU,<kg>MMLU</kg>, KILT,<kg>KILT</kg>, and NaturalQuestions,<kg>NaturalQuestions</kg>, they demonstrate Atlas's ability to achieve over 42% accuracy on Natural Questions using just 64 examples.<kf>Remarkably,</kf> Atlas outperforms a model with 540 billion parameters by 3%, despite having significantly fewer parameters (50 times less).
Created on 27 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.