AI summary · arXiv: 2208.03740v2 · cs.LG

Multi-agent reinforcement learning for intent-based service assurance in cellular networks

Satheesh K. Perepu, Jean P. Martins, Ricardo Souza S, Kaushik Dey
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 07 Aug. 2022 Accepted at Globecom 2022 conference License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Intent-based management in telecom networks is gaining attention due to performance requirements.
  • Traditional closed-loop methods for fulfilling Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) treat each loop independently, leading to performance degradation.
  • Scalability is a challenge for existing approaches in intent-based management.
  • Techniques like MARL have emerged as a promising solution for coordination and conflict management among loops.
  • MARL-based method proposed by Satheesh K. Perepu et al. achieved intent-based management without prior knowledge of the system model.
  • The MARL system successfully optimized KPIs for three services in experiments using a network emulator.
  • MARL shows potential in enhancing intent-based service assurance within cellular networks, especially with future technologies like 6G.
  • Leveraging MARL for intent-based networking offers a dynamic and adaptive framework for efficiently achieving diverse objectives.
  • MARL can facilitate interactions between closed loops, prioritize critical KPIs autonomously, and enhance network performance in telecommunications.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Telecom networks Intent-based management Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) Network performance Service delivery

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the realm of telecom networks, intent-based management has garnered significant attention due to the stringent performance requirements across various use cases. Traditional closed-loop driven methods have been commonly employed in literature to fulfill intents related to Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). However, these methods often treat each closed-loop independently, leading to a degradation in overall performance. Moreover, scalability remains a challenge for existing approaches. To address these limitations, techniques have emerged as a promising solution for complex coordination and conflict management among loops. In a recent study by Satheesh K. Perepu et al., a method based on MARL was proposed to achieve intent-based management without requiring prior knowledge of the underlying system model. This innovative approach enables MARL agents to incentivize cooperation and promote trade-offs among loops when conflicting intents arise, all without human intervention. The researchers conducted experiments using a network emulator to optimize KPIs for three services. The results demonstrated that the MARL-based system performed admirably, successfully fulfilling all existing intents when sufficient resources were available or prioritizing KPIs effectively in resource-constrained scenarios. This novel approach showcases the potential of MARL in enhancing intent-based service assurance within cellular networks. Looking towards the future, as networks evolve towards technologies like 6G, where network operators' intents will play a pivotal role, leveraging MARL for intent-based networking could prove instrumental. By decomposing intents into objectives and optimizing parameters through closed loops within network slices, MARL offers a dynamic and adaptive framework for achieving diverse objectives efficiently. With its ability to facilitate interactions between closed loops and prioritize critical KPIs autonomously, for enhancing network performance and ensuring seamless service delivery in the ever-evolving landscape of telecommunications.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Related
    Towards Adaptive IMFs -- Generalization of utility functions in Multi-Agent Frameworks
    Kaushik Dey, Satheesh K. Perepu, Abir Das et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Intent Management Function (IMF) is an integral part of future-generation networks. In recent years, there has been some work on AI-based IMFs that can handle conflicting intents and prioritize the global objective based on apriori definition of the utility function and accorded priorities for competing intents. Some of the earlier works use Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for efficient conflict handling in IMF. However, the success of such frameworks in real-life scenarios requires them to be flexible to business situations. The intent priorities can change and the utility function, which measures the extent of intent fulfilment, may …

  2. Related
    Agentic AI for Intent-Based Industrial Automation
    Marcos Lima Romero, Ricardo Suyama · 2025 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The recent development of Agentic AI systems, empowered by autonomous large language models (LLMs) agents with planning and tool-usage capabilities, enables new possibilities for the evolution of industrial automation and reduces the complexity introduced by Industry 4.0. This work proposes a conceptual framework that integrates Agentic AI with the intent-based paradigm, originally developed in network research, to simplify human-machine interaction (HMI) and better align automation systems with the human-centric, sustainable, and resilient principles of Industry 5.0. Based on the intent-based processing, the framework allows human operators to express high-level business or operational goal…

  3. Related
    Multi-Agent Environments for Vehicle Routing Problems
    Ricardo Gama, Daniel Fuertes, Carlos R. del-Blanco et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Research on Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches for discrete optimization problems has increased considerably, extending RL to an area classically dominated by Operations Research (OR). Vehicle routing problems are a good example of discrete optimization problems with high practical relevance where RL techniques have had considerable success. Despite these advances, open-source development frameworks remain scarce, hampering both the testing of algorithms and the ability to objectively compare results. This ultimately slows down progress in the field and limits the exchange of ideas between the RL and OR communities. Here we propose a library composed of multi-agent environments that simu…

  4. Related
    Symphony: Learning Realistic and Diverse Agents for Autonomous Driving Simulation
    Maximilian Igl, Daewoo Kim, Alex Kuefler et al. · 2022 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Simulation is a crucial tool for accelerating the development of autonomous vehicles. Making simulation realistic requires models of the human road users who interact with such cars. Such models can be obtained by applying learning from demonstration (LfD) to trajectories observed by cars already on the road. However, existing LfD methods are typically insufficient, yielding policies that frequently collide or drive off the road. To address this problem, we propose Symphony, which greatly improves realism by combining conventional policies with a parallel beam search. The beam search refines these policies on the fly by pruning branches that are unfavourably evaluated by a discriminator. How…

  5. Related
    SWEET-RL: Training Multi-Turn LLM Agents on Collaborative Reasoning Tasks
    Yifei Zhou, Song Jiang, Yuandong Tian et al. · 2025 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Large language model (LLM) agents need to perform multi-turn interactions in real-world tasks. However, existing multi-turn RL algorithms for optimizing LLM agents fail to perform effective credit assignment over multiple turns while leveraging the generalization capabilities of LLMs and it remains unclear how to develop such algorithms. To study this, we first introduce a new benchmark, ColBench, where an LLM agent interacts with a human collaborator over multiple turns to solve realistic tasks in backend programming and frontend design. Building on this benchmark, we propose a novel RL algorithm, SWEET-RL (RL with Step-WisE Evaluation from Training-time information), that uses a carefully …

  6. Related
    StepCountJITAI: simulation environment for RL with application to physical activity adaptive intervention
    Karine Karine, Benjamin M. Marlin · 2024 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The use of reinforcement learning (RL) to learn policies for just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) is of significant interest in many behavioral intervention domains including improving levels of physical activity. In a messaging-based physical activity JITAI, a mobile health app is typically used to send messages to a participant to encourage engagement in physical activity. In this setting, RL methods can be used to learn what intervention options to provide to a participant in different contexts. However, deploying RL methods in real physical activity adaptive interventions comes with challenges: the cost and time constraints of real intervention studies result in limited data to l…

  7. Related
    AgentFly: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs
    Huichi Zhou, Yihang Chen, Siyuan Guo et al. · 2025 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    In this paper, we introduce a novel learning paradigm for adaptive Large Language Model (LLM) agents that eliminates the need for fine-tuning the underlying LLMs. Existing approaches are often either rigid, relying on static, handcrafted reflection workflows, or computationally intensive, requiring gradient updates of LLM model parameters. In contrast, our method enables low-cost continual adaptation via memory-based online reinforcement learning. We formalise this as a Memory-augmented Markov Decision Process (M-MDP), equipped with a neural case-selection policy to guide action decisions. Past experiences are stored in an episodic memory, either differentiable or non-parametric. The policy …

  8. Related
    Cooperative Heterogeneous Deep Reinforcement Learning
    Han Zheng, Pengfei Wei, Jing Jiang et al. · 2020 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Numerous deep reinforcement learning agents have been proposed, and each of them has its strengths and flaws. In this work, we present a Cooperative Heterogeneous Deep Reinforcement Learning (CHDRL) framework that can learn a policy by integrating the advantages of heterogeneous agents. Specifically, we propose a cooperative learning framework that classifies heterogeneous agents into two classes: global agents and local agents. Global agents are off-policy agents that can utilize experiences from the other agents. Local agents are either on-policy agents or population-based evolutionary algorithms (EAs) agents that can explore the local area effectively. We employ global agents, which are s…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.