Do-AIQ: A Design-of-Experiment Approach to Quality Evaluation of AI Mislabel Detection Algorithm

Authors: J. Lian, K. Choi, B. Veeramani, A. Hu, L. Freeman, E. Bowen, X. Deng

Abstract: The quality of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms is of significant importance for confidently adopting algorithms in various applications such as cybersecurity, healthcare, and autonomous driving. This work presents a principled framework of using a design-of-experimental approach to systematically evaluate the quality of AI algorithms, named as Do-AIQ. Specifically, we focus on investigating the quality of the AI mislabel data algorithm against data poisoning. The performance of AI algorithms is affected by hyperparameters in the algorithm and data quality, particularly, data mislabeling, class imbalance, and data types. To evaluate the quality of the AI algorithms and obtain a trustworthy assessment on the quality of the algorithms, we establish a design-of-experiment framework to construct an efficient space-filling design in a high-dimensional constraint space and develop an effective surrogate model using additive Gaussian process to enable the emulation of the quality of AI algorithms. Both theoretical and numerical studies are conducted to justify the merits of the proposed framework. The proposed framework can set an exemplar for AI algorithm to enhance the AI assurance of robustness, reproducibility, and transparency.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.09953v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 18 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.