Data-driven prediction of room temperature density for multicomponent silicate-based glasses
Authors: Kai Gong, Elsa Olivetti
Abstract: Density is one of the most commonly measured or estimated materials properties, especially for glasses and melts that are of significant interest to many fields, including metallurgy, geology, materials science and sustainable cements. Here, two types of machine learning (ML) models (i.e., random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN)) have been developed to predict the room-temperature density of glasses in the compositional space of CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2-FeO-Fe2O3-Na2O-K2O-MnO (CMASTFNKM), based on ~2100 data points mined from ~140 literature studies. The results show that the RF and ANN models give accurate predictions of glass density with R2 values, RMSE, and MAPE of ~0.96-0.98, ~0.02-0.03 g/cm3 and ~0.59-0.79%, respectively, for the 15% testing set, which are more accurate compared with empirical density models based on ionic packing ratio (with R2 values, RMSE, and MAPE of ~0.28-0.91, ~0.05-0.15 g/cm3, and ~1.40-4.61%, respectively). Furthermore, glass density is shown to be a reliable reactivity indicator for a range of CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 (CAS) and volcanic glasses due to its strong correlation (R2 values above ~0.90) with the average metal-oxygen dissociation energy (a structural descriptor) of these glasses. Analysis of the predicted density-composition relationships from these models (for selected compositional subspaces) suggests that the ANN model exhibits a certain level of transferability (i.e., ability to extrapolate to compositional space not (or less) covered in the database) and captures known features including the mixed alkaline earth effects for (CaO-MgO)0.5-(Al2O3-SiO2)0.5 glasses.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.