A Sun-like star orbiting a black hole
AI-generated Key Points
- A Sun-like star has been discovered orbiting the nearest known black hole by a factor of three
- The system was identified as a black hole candidate via its astrometric orbital solution from the Gaia mission
- Radial velocity monitoring validated and refined the Gaia solution
- Spectroscopy ruled out significant light contributions from another star
- Joint modeling of radial velocities and astrometry constrained the companion mass to $M_2 = 9.8\pm0.2\,M_{\odot}$
- The spectroscopic orbit alone set a minimum companion mass of $M_2>5\,M_{\odot}$
- The orbital period of this system is longer than that of any known stellar-mass black hole binary at 185.6 days with an eccentricity of 0.45
- Its Galactic orbit is typical of thin-disk stars suggesting that it formed in the Milky Way disk with at most a weak natal kick
- Explaining its formation with standard binary evolutionary models is challenging
- This discovery suggests that there may be a sizable population of dormant black holes in binaries waiting to be discovered through future Gaia releases or other surveys
Authors: Kareem El-Badry, Hans-Walter Rix, Eliot Quataert, Andrew W. Howard, Howard Isaacson, Jim Fuller, Keith Hawkins, Katelyn Breivik, Kaze W. K. Wong, Antonio C. Rodriguez, Charlie Conroy, Sahar Shahaf, Tsevi Mazeh, Frédéric Arenou, Kevin B. Burdge, Dolev Bashi, Simchon Faigler, Daniel R. Weisz, Rhys Seeburger, Silvia Almada Monter, Jennifer Wojno
Abstract: We report discovery of a bright, nearby ($G = 13.8$; $d = 480$ pc) Sun-like star orbiting a dark object. We identified the system as a black hole candidate via its astrometric orbital solution from the Gaia mission. Radial velocity monitoring validated and refined the Gaia solution, and spectroscopy ruled out significant light contributions from another star. Joint modeling of radial velocities and astrometry constrains the companion mass to $M_2 = 9.8\pm 0.2\,M_{\odot}$. The spectroscopic orbit alone sets a minimum companion mass of $M_2>5\,M_{\odot}$; if the companion were a $5\,M_{\odot}$ star, it would be 500 times more luminous than the entire system. These constraints are insensitive to the assumed mass of the luminous star, which appears as a slowly-rotating G dwarf ($T_{\rm eff}=5850$ K, $\log g = 4.5$, $M=0.93\,M_{\odot}$), with near-solar metallicity ([Fe/H] = -0.2) and an unremarkable abundance pattern. We find no plausible astrophysical scenario that can explain the orbit and does not involve a black hole. The orbital period, $P_{\rm orb}=185.6$ days, is longer than that of any known stellar-mass black hole binary, and the eccentricity is modest, $e=0.45$. The system's Galactic orbit is typical of thin-disk stars, suggesting that it formed in the Milky Way disk with at most a weak natal kick. Explaining the system's formation with standard binary evolutionary models is challenging: it is difficult for the luminous star to survive a common envelope event under standard assumptions, and difficult for it to end up in a wide orbit afterward. Formation models involving triples or dynamical assembly in an open cluster may be more promising. This is the nearest known black hole by a factor of 3, and its discovery suggests the existence of a sizable population of dormant black holes in binaries. Future Gaia releases will likely facilitate the discovery of dozens more.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.