Data-driven and machine-learning based prediction of wave propagation behavior in dam-break flood
Authors: Changli Li, Zheng Han, Yange Li, Ming Li, Weidong Wang
Abstract: The computational prediction of wave propagation in dam-break floods is a long-standing problem in hydrodynamics and hydrology. Until now, conventional numerical models based on Saint-Venant equations are the dominant approaches. Here we show that a machine learning model that is well-trained on a minimal amount of data, can help predict the long-term dynamic behavior of a one-dimensional dam-break flood with satisfactory accuracy. For this purpose, we solve the Saint-Venant equations for a one-dimensional dam-break flood scenario using the Lax-Wendroff numerical scheme and train the reservoir computing echo state network (RC-ESN) with the dataset by the simulation results consisting of time-sequence flow depths. We demonstrate a good prediction ability of the RC-ESN model, which ahead predicts wave propagation behavior 286 time-steps in the dam-break flood with a root mean square error (RMSE) smaller than 0.01, outperforming the conventional long short-term memory (LSTM) model which reaches a comparable RMSE of only 81 time-steps ahead. To show the performance of the RC-ESN model, we also provide a sensitivity analysis of the prediction accuracy concerning the key parameters including training set size, reservoir size, and spectral radius. Results indicate that the RC-ESN are less dependent on the training set size, a medium reservoir size K=1200~2600 is sufficient. We confirm that the spectral radius \r{ho} shows a complex influence on the prediction accuracy and suggest a smaller spectral radius \r{ho} currently. By changing the initial flow depth of the dam break, we also obtained the conclusion that the prediction horizon of RC-ESN is larger than that of LSTM.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.