Hebbian Deep Learning Without Feedback
Authors: Adrien Journé, Hector Garcia Rodriguez, Qinghai Guo, Timoleon Moraitis
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors address limitations of backpropagation (BP) in neural network training
- Proposed approach called multilayer SoftHebb overcomes challenges without feedback, target, or error signals
- SoftHebb leverages Hebbian learning principles in soft winner-take-all networks
- Eliminates weight transport, non-local plasticity, time-locking of layer updates, iterative equilibria, and supervisory feedback signals for efficiency
- Maintains high accuracy levels while enhancing efficiency and biological plausibility
- Demonstrates superior performance on popular datasets like MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10, and ImageNet
- Achieves accuracies reaching 99.4%, 80.3%, 76.2%, and 27.3% respectively with up to five hidden layers and a linear classifier
- Challenges conventional wisdom by showcasing that a few layers may be sufficient for effective neural network training
- Represents a paradigm shift from traditional backpropagation methods towards more biologically inspired and accurate alternatives
Abstract: Recent approximations to backpropagation (BP) have mitigated many of BP's computational inefficiencies and incompatibilities with biology, but important limitations still remain. Moreover, the approximations significantly decrease accuracy in benchmarks, suggesting that an entirely different approach may be more fruitful. Here, grounded on recent theory for Hebbian learning in soft winner-take-all networks, we present multilayer SoftHebb, i.e. an algorithm that trains deep neural networks, without any feedback, target, or error signals. As a result, it achieves efficiency by avoiding weight transport, non-local plasticity, time-locking of layer updates, iterative equilibria, and (self-) supervisory or other feedback signals -- which were necessary in other approaches. Its increased efficiency and biological compatibility do not trade off accuracy compared to state-of-the-art bio-plausible learning, but rather improve it. With up to five hidden layers and an added linear classifier, accuracies on MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10, and ImageNet, respectively reach 99.4%, 80.3%, 76.2%, and 27.3%. In conclusion, SoftHebb shows with a radically different approach from BP that Deep Learning over few layers may be plausible in the brain and increases the accuracy of bio-plausible machine learning.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.