Actinide opacities for modeling the spectra and light curves of kilonovae
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- C.J. Fontes and colleagues conducted a study on actinide opacities for use in modeling kilonova (KN) light curves and spectra
- The researchers used the configuration-interaction approach to generate detailed, fine-structure line features
- Opacity tables for 14 actinide elements were pre-computed over a grid of relevant temperatures and densities using a line-binned treatment
- These tabular opacities will be made publicly available for general usage in KN modeling
- The researchers explored the sensitivity of light curves and spectra to different actinide abundance distributions predicted by different nuclear theories, as well as to different choices of ejecta mass and velocity
- Very little sensitivity was found to the two considered distributions, indicating that opacities for actinides with $Z \ge 99$ do not contribute strongly
- A single actinide element, protactinium, produces faint spectral features in the far infrared at late times (5-7 days post merger)
- The choice of ejecta mass and velocity has the most significant effect on KN emission for this study
Authors: C. J. Fontes, C. L. Fryer, R. T. Wollaeger, M. R. Mumpower, T. M. Sprouse
Abstract: We extend previous ab initio calculations of lanthanide opacities (Fontes et al., 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4143) to include a complete set of actinide opacities for use in the modeling of kilonova light curves and spectra. Detailed, fine-structure line features are generated using the configuration-interaction approach. These actinide opacities display similar trends to those observed for lanthanide opacities, such as the lighter actinides producing higher opacity than the heavier ones for relevant conditions in the dynamical ejecta. A line-binned treatment is employed to pre-compute opacity tables for 14 actinide elements $(89 \le Z \le 102)$ over a grid of relevant temperatures and densities. These tabular opacities will be made publicly available for general usage in kilonova modeling. We demonstrate the usefulness of these opacities in kilonova simulations by exploring the sensitivity of light curves and spectra to different actinide abundance distributions that are predicted by different nuclear theories, as well as to different choices of ejecta mass and velocity. We find very little sensitivity to the two considered distributions, indicating that opacities for actinides with $Z \ge 99$ do not contribute strongly. On the other hand, a single actinide element, protactinium, is found to produce faint spectral features in the far infrared at late times (5-7 days post merger). More generally, we find that the choice of ejecta mass and velocity have the most significant effect on KN emission for this study.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.