Euclid preparation. XXV. The Euclid Morphology Challenge -- Towards model-fitting photometry for billions of galaxies

AI-generated keywords: Euclid mission

AI-generated Key Points

The Euclid mission aims to provide high-quality imaging for approximately 1.5 billion galaxies.
The Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium is developing a software pipeline that includes a model-fitting algorithm to process and analyze such vast amounts of data in real-time.
The Euclid Morphology Challenge is an investigation comparing the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data to identify the most suitable algorithm for implementation in the pipeline.
Diagnostic plots were created to analyze results, and ad-hoc metrics were defined, including the global metric S used to evaluate each software package's performance on three different realizations: SS, DS (IE-only), and RM (multi-band).
Each code had strengths and weaknesses; therefore, no rigorous evaluation or ranking was possible based solely on these metrics. However, all software packages provided acceptable to good results in at least some cases.
Simultaneous fitting of multi-band data sets proved important as using information from deep high-resolution IE band helped obtain more accurate measurements on shallower NIR bands as well as ground-based LSST bands.
While the study did not investigate the performance of model-fitting algorithms in the context of the Euclid Deep Survey, it is expected that results should be similar to those obtained for the Wide Survey at equivalent signal-to-noise ratio (S/N).
The results set a baseline for deciding which algorithm to implement in the Euclid pipeline, with one possible approach being to use a combination of chosen algorithms. Ultimately, these findings will benefit both core science goals and legacy use within the community.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. Davini, N. Mauri, L. Patrizii, G. Sirri, Y. Wang, A. A. Nucita, O. Ilbert, M. Meneghetti, Euclid Collaboration, G. Desprez, S. Paltani, J. Coupon, M. Brescia, S. Cavuoti, W. G. Hartley, A. Tramacere, M. Castellano, F. Dubath, E. Merlin, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balaguera-Antolínez, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, R. Bender, A. Biviano, C. Bodendorf, E. Branchini, C. Burigana, R. Cabanac, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, A. Cappi, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, C. S. Carvalho, S. Casas, F. J. Castander, G. Castignani, A. Cimatti, R. Cledassou, C. Colodro-Conde, G. Congedo, C. J. Conselice, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, L. Corcione, H. M. Courtois, A. Da Silva, H. Degaudenzi, D. Di Ferdinando, M. Douspis, C. A. J. Duncan, X. Dupac, S. Farrens, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, S. Galeotta, B. Garilli, B. Gillis, C. Giocoli, G. Gozaliasl, J. Graciá-Carpio, F. Grupp, S. V. H. Haugan, W. Holmes, F. Hormuth, K. Jahnke, E. Keihanen, S. Kermiche, C. C. Kirkpatrick, R. Kohley, M. Kunz, H. Kurki-Suonio, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, I. Lloro, O. Marggraf, K. Markovic, N. Martinet, F. Marulli, R. Massey, M. Maturi, E. Medinaceli, S. Mei, G. Meylan, M. Moresco, L. Moscardini, E. Munari, C. Padilla, F. Pasian, G. Polenta, M. Poncet, L. Popa, D. Potter, L. Pozzetti, F. Raison, A. Renzi, J. Rhodes, G. Riccio, E. Rossetti, R. Saglia, D. Sapone, P. Schneider, V. Scottez, A. Secroun, C. Sirignano, A. N. Taylor, I. Tereno, R. Toledo-Moreo, L. Valenziano, J. Valiviita, T. Vassallo, M. Viel, A. Zacchei, G. Zamorani, J. Zoubian, E. Zucca, F. Courbin, H. Bretonnière, M. Huertas-Company, U. Kuchner, D. Tuccillo, F. Buitrago, J. R. Peterson, F. Caro, P. Dimauro, L. Nemani, A. Fontana, M. Kümmel, B. Häußler, A. Alvarez Ayllon, E. Bertin, P. Dubath, F. Ferrari, L. Ferreira, R. Gavazzi, D. Hernández-Lang, G. Lucatelli, A. S. G. Robotham, M. Schefer, C. Tortora, N. Aghanim, A. Amara, L. Amendola, M. Cropper, J. Dinis, S. Dusini, S. Ferriol, P. Franzetti, A. Grazian, H. Hoekstra, A. Hornstrup, P. Hudelot, A. Kiessling, T. Kitching, O. Mansutti, H. J McCracken, M. Melchior, S. M. Niemi, K. Pedersen, W. J. Percival, R. Rebolo, E. Romelli, B. Sartoris, G. Seidel, J. Skottfelt, J. -L. Starck, P. Tallada-Crespí, I. Tutusaus, J. Weller, A. Boucaud, V. Lindholm, C. Neissner, M. Ballardini, F. Bernardeau, S. Borgani, A. S. Borlaff, A. R. Cooray, O. Cucciati, G. De Lucia, J. A. Escartin, S. Escoffier, M. Farina, K. Ganga, J. Garcia-Bellido, K. George, H. Hildebrandt, I. Hook, S. Ilic, B. Joachimi, V. Kansal, A. Loureiro, J. Macias-Perez, M. Magliocchetti, G. Mainetti, R. Maoli, S. Marcin, M. Martinelli, S. Matthew, R. B. Metcalf, P. Monaco, G. Morgante, S. Nadathur, V. Popa, C. Porciani, A. Pourtsidou, M. Pöntinen, P. Reimberg, A. G. Sánchez, Z. Sakr, M. Schirmer, M. Sereno, J. Stadel, R. Teyssier, C. Valieri, S. E. van Mierlo, A. Veropalumbo, J. R. Weaver, D. Scott

A&A 671, A101 (2023)

arXiv: 2209.12906v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)

29 pages, 33 figures. Euclid pre-launch key paper. Companion paper: Bretonniere et al. 2022

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The ESA Euclid mission will provide high-quality imaging for about 1.5 billion galaxies. A software pipeline to automatically process and analyse such a huge amount of data in real time is being developed by the Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium; this pipeline will include a model-fitting algorithm, which will provide photometric and morphological estimates of paramount importance for the core science goals of the mission and for legacy science. The Euclid Morphology Challenge is a comparative investigation of the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data, aimed at providing the baseline to identify the best suited algorithm to be implemented in the pipeline. In this paper we describe the simulated data set, and we discuss the photometry results. A companion paper (Euclid Collaboration: Bretonni\`ere et al. 2022) is focused on the structural and morphological estimates. We created mock Euclid images simulating five fields of view of 0.48 deg2 each in the $I_E$ band of the VIS instrument, each with three realisations of galaxy profiles (single and double S\'ersic, and 'realistic' profiles obtained with a neural network); for one of the fields in the double S\'ersic realisation, we also simulated images for the three near-infrared $Y_E$, $J_E$ and $H_E$ bands of the NISP-P instrument, and five Rubin/LSST optical complementary bands ($u$, $g$, $r$, $i$, and $z$). To analyse the results we created diagnostic plots and defined ad-hoc metrics. Five model-fitting software packages (DeepLeGATo, Galapagos-2, Morfometryka, ProFit, and SourceXtractor++) were compared, all typically providing good results. (cut)

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Sep. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.12906v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

The Euclid mission, led by the European Space Agency (ESA), aims to provide high-quality imaging for approximately 1.5 billion galaxies. To process and analyze such a vast amount of data in real-time, the Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium is developing a software pipeline that includes a model-fitting algorithm. This algorithm will provide photometric and morphological estimates crucial to achieving the core science goals of the mission and for legacy science. The Euclid Morphology Challenge is an investigation comparing the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data to identify the most suitable algorithm for implementation in the pipeline. The simulated dataset used in this study included five fields of view, each with three realizations of galaxy profiles: single and double S\'ersic, and 'realistic' profiles obtained with a neural network. For one field in the double S\'ersic realization, images were also simulated for three near-infrared bands ($Y_E$, $J_E$, $H_E$) and five Rubin/LSST optical complementary bands ($u$, $g$, $r$, $i$, and $z$). Diagnostic plots were created to analyze results, and ad-hoc metrics were defined. The global metric S was used to evaluate each software package's performance on three different realizations: SS, DS (IE-only), and RM (multi-band). Each code had strengths and weaknesses; therefore, no rigorous evaluation or ranking was possible based solely on these metrics. However, all software packages provided acceptable to good results in at least some cases. Additionally, it was observed that all codes tended to underestimate uncertainties at the bright end but provided reasonable estimates for intermediate- and faint-sources statistically. Simultaneous fitting of multi-band data sets proved important as using information from deep high-resolution IE band helped obtain more accurate measurements on shallower NIR bands as well as ground-based LSST bands. While the study did not investigate the performance of model-fitting algorithms in the context of the Euclid Deep Survey, it is expected that results should be similar to those obtained for the Wide Survey at equivalent signal to noise ratio (S/N). However, increased contamination and blending might worsen performance. The results of this study set a baseline for deciding which algorithm to implement in the Euclid pipeline, with one possible approach being to use a combination of chosen algorithms. Ultimately, these findings will benefit both core science goals and legacy use within the community.

- The Euclid mission aims to provide high-quality imaging for approximately 1.5 billion galaxies.
- The Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium is developing a software pipeline that includes a model-fitting algorithm to process and analyze such vast amounts of data in real-time.
- The Euclid Morphology Challenge is an investigation comparing the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data to identify the most suitable algorithm for implementation in the pipeline.
- Diagnostic plots were created to analyze results, and ad-hoc metrics were defined, including the global metric S used to evaluate each software package's performance on three different realizations: SS, DS (IE-only), and RM (multi-band).
- Each code had strengths and weaknesses; therefore, no rigorous evaluation or ranking was possible based solely on these metrics. However, all software packages provided acceptable to good results in at least some cases.
- Simultaneous fitting of multi-band data sets proved important as using information from deep high-resolution IE band helped obtain more accurate measurements on shallower NIR bands as well as ground-based LSST bands.
- While the study did not investigate the performance of model-fitting algorithms in the context of the Euclid Deep Survey, it is expected that results should be similar to those obtained for the Wide Survey at equivalent signal-to-noise ratio (S/N).
- The results set a baseline for deciding which algorithm to implement in the Euclid pipeline, with one possible approach being to use a combination of chosen algorithms. Ultimately, these findings will benefit both core science goals and legacy use within the community.

Euclid is a mission that takes pictures of many galaxies. Scientists are making a computer program to look at all the pictures and find important information. They tested five different programs to see which one works the best. They made special graphs and measurements to compare them. All the programs did well in some cases, but none were perfect. They found out that looking at different types of light helps get better results. This study will help scientists decide which program to use for the Euclid mission, and it will help other people who want to use this information too. Definitions- Euclid: A space mission that takes pictures of galaxies. - Algorithm: A set of instructions given to a computer to solve a problem or complete a task. - Pipeline: A series of connected steps used to process data or perform tasks automatically. - Simulated data: Data created by a computer program that imitates real-life situations for testing purposes. - Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N): The measure of how strong a signal is compared to background noise in an image or data set.

Exploring the Euclid Morphology Challenge

The European Space Agency (ESA) is leading a mission to image 1.5 billion galaxies with high-quality imaging: The Euclid mission. To process and analyze such a vast amount of data in real-time, the Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium is developing a software pipeline that includes a model-fitting algorithm. This algorithm will be crucial for achieving the core science goals of the mission as well as any legacy use within the community. To identify which model-fitting software package would be most suitable for implementation in this pipeline, ESA conducted an investigation called The Euclid Morphology Challenge.

The Simulated Dataset Used

For this study, five fields of view were simulated with three different galaxy profiles: single and double S\'ersic, and 'realistic' profiles obtained with a neural network. For one field in the double S\'ersic realization, images were also simulated for three near-infrared bands ($Y_E$, $J_E$, $H_E$) and five Rubin/LSST optical complementary bands ($u$, $g$, $r$, $i$, and $z$). Five different software packages were then tested on these simulations to compare their performance.

Analyzing Results

Diagnostic plots were created to analyze results from each code's performance on three different realizations: SS, DS (IE-only), and RM (multi-band). Ad hoc metrics were defined to evaluate each software package's accuracy; however, no rigorous evaluation or ranking was possible based solely on these metrics due to strengths and weaknesses observed in all codes tested. It was found that all codes tended to underestimate uncertainties at the bright end but provided reasonable estimates for intermediate-and faint sources statistically. Additionally, it was determined that simultaneous fitting of multi-band data sets proved important as using information from deep high resolution IE band helped obtain more accurate measurements on shallower NIR bands as well as ground based LSST bands.

Conclusion

While this study did not investigate how model fitting algorithms would perform during the Euclid Deep Survey specifically, it is expected that results should be similar at equivalent signal to noise ratio (S/N). However increased contamination and blending may worsen performance overall when compared with Wide Survey conditions used here in this study. These findings provide insight into which algorithm could potentially be implemented into the Euclid pipeline; one approach being considered is using a combination of chosen algorithms depending on various factors such as brightness or size of objects being analyzed etc.. Ultimately these results will benefit both core science goals set by ESA’s mission objectives as well as any future legacy use within astronomy research communities worldwide .

Created on 16 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

73.5%

Euclid preparation XXVI: The Euclid Morphology Challenge. Towards structural …

astro-ph.GA

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.