Antibody Representation Learning for Drug Discovery
Authors: Lin Li, Esther Gupta, John Spaeth, Leslie Shing, Tristan Bepler, Rajmonda Sulo Caceres
Abstract: Therapeutic antibody development has become an increasingly popular approach for drug development. To date, antibody therapeutics are largely developed using large scale experimental screens of antibody libraries containing hundreds of millions of antibody sequences. The high cost and difficulty of developing therapeutic antibodies create a pressing need for computational methods to predict antibody properties and create bespoke designs. However, the relationship between antibody sequence and activity is a complex physical process and traditional iterative design approaches rely on large scale assays and random mutagenesis. Deep learning methods have emerged as a promising way to learn antibody property predictors, but predicting antibody properties and target-specific activities depends critically on the choice of antibody representations and data linking sequences to properties is often limited. Existing works have not yet investigated the value, limitations and opportunities of these methods in application to antibody-based drug discovery. In this paper, we present results on a novel SARS-CoV-2 antibody binding dataset and an additional benchmark dataset. We compare three classes of models: conventional statistical sequence models, supervised learning on each dataset independently, and fine-tuning an antibody specific pre-trained language model. Experimental results suggest that self-supervised pretraining of feature representation consistently offers significant improvement in over previous approaches. We also investigate the impact of data size on the model performance, and discuss challenges and opportunities that the machine learning community can address to advance in silico engineering and design of therapeutic antibodies.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.