Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.03080v1

This paper titled "Explainable Verbal Deception Detection using Transformers" addresses the issue of deceptive statements that people encounter in their daily lives, such as fake news, misleading product reviews, or lies about activities. The authors highlight the limited use of deep learning approaches in automated text-based deception detection and the lack of interpretability in these methods. However, recent advancements have made it possible to explain certain aspects of deep learning models. The paper proposes and evaluates six deep-learning models that utilize BERT (and RoBERTa), MultiHead Attention, co-attentions, and transformers. To gain insights into how these models make decisions, the authors employ LIME to examine the model's predictions. Additionally, they focus on vocabulary uniqueness and the correlation between LIWC categories (linguistic inquiry and word count) and the outcome class (truthful vs deceptive). The findings indicate that transformer-based models can improve automated deception detection performance by 2.11% in accuracy. Moreover, significant differences are observed regarding the usage of LIWC features in truthful and deceptive statements. Overall, this research contributes to enhancing our understanding of deep learning approaches for deception detection while providing insights into how these models reach their decisions. The results suggest that transformer-based models show promise in effectively detecting deception in text-based content.

• - Deceptive statements in daily life: fake news, misleading product reviews, lies about activities
• - Limited use of deep learning approaches in automated text-based deception detection
• - Lack of interpretability in deep learning methods
• - Recent advancements allow for explaining aspects of deep learning models
• - Proposal and evaluation of six deep-learning models utilizing BERT, MultiHead Attention, co-attentions, and transformers
• - Use of LIME to examine model predictions and gain insights into decision-making process
• - Focus on vocabulary uniqueness and correlation between LIWC categories and outcome class (truthful vs deceptive)
• - Transformer-based models improve deception detection performance by 2.11% in accuracy
• - Significant differences observed in LIWC feature usage between truthful and deceptive statements
• - Enhances understanding of deep learning approaches for deception detection
• - Transformer-based models show promise in effectively detecting deception in text-based content

Deceptive statements are when people say things that aren't true, like fake news or lies about something. Deep learning is a way computers can learn and understand information. But sometimes it's hard to know why the computer made certain decisions. Recently, there have been improvements in understanding how deep learning works. Some new models called BERT, MultiHead Attention, co-attentions, and transformers are being used to detect deception in text. By using these models, we can better understand why they make certain predictions and improve how well they can detect lies.

Explainable Verbal Deception Detection using Transformers

Deceptive statements are a common occurrence in our daily lives, from fake news to misleading product reviews and lies about activities. While deep learning approaches have been used to automate text-based deception detection, these methods lack interpretability. However, recent advancements have made it possible to explain certain aspects of deep learning models. This paper titled "Explainable Verbal Deception Detection using Transformers" proposes and evaluates six deep-learning models that utilize BERT (and RoBERTa), MultiHead Attention, co-attentions, and transformers for the task of verbal deception detection.

Background

The authors begin by discussing the need for automated text-based deception detection systems due to the increasing prevalence of deceptive content on social media platforms and other online sources. They then review existing approaches based on traditional machine learning algorithms such as support vector machines (SVMs) as well as more recent deep learning techniques such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These methods are effective but lack interpretability; thus making it difficult to understand why they make certain decisions or how they can be improved upon.

Proposed Models

The authors propose six transformer-based models that combine BERT (and RoBERTa) with MultiHead Attention layers, co-attention mechanisms, and self-attention layers. To gain insights into how these models make decisions, they employ LIME (Local Interpretable Model Explanations) to examine the model's predictions. Additionally, they focus on vocabulary uniqueness and the correlation between LIWC categories (linguistic inquiry and word count) and the outcome class (truthful vs deceptive).

Results & Findings

The results indicate that transformer-based models can improve automated deception detection performance by 2.11% in accuracy compared to traditional machine learning algorithms such as SVMs or CNNs. Moreover, significant differences were observed regarding the usage of LIWC features in truthful versus deceptive statements: words associated with positive emotions were found more often in truthful statements while words associated with negative emotions were found more often in deceptive ones.

Conclusion

Overall this research contributes to enhancing our understanding of deep learning approaches for deception detection while providing insights into how these models reach their decisions. The results suggest that transformer-based models show promise in effectively detecting deception in text-based content while providing an explanation for their decision making process through LIME analysis.