Context Generation Improves Open Domain Question Answering

AI-generated keywords: Context Generation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper proposes a two-stage framework for closed-book question answering (QA)
  • The approach utilizes pretrained language models (LMs) to exploit stored knowledge
  • A coarse-to-fine approach is used to extract relevant knowledge and provide answers
  • Experimental results show significant improvement over previous closed-book QA methods
  • Achieves an exact matching accuracy of 68.6% on three QA benchmarks
  • Performs on par with open-book methods that use external knowledge sources
  • Authored by Dan Su, Mostofa Patwary, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Peng Xu, Ryan Prenger, Mohammad Shoeybi, Pascale Fung, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catanzaro
  • Accepted at EACL2023 conference
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dan Su, Mostofa Patwary, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Peng Xu, Ryan Prenger, Mohammad Shoeybi, Pascale Fung, Anima Anandkumar, Bryan Catanzaro

8 pages; Accepted at EACL2023

Abstract: Closed-book question answering (QA) requires a model to directly answer an open-domain question without access to any external knowledge. Prior work on closed-book QA either directly finetunes or prompts a pretrained language model (LM) to leverage the stored knowledge. However, they do not fully exploit the parameterized knowledge. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage, closed-book QA framework which employs a coarse-to-fine approach to extract relevant knowledge and answer a question. Our approach first generates a related context for a given question by prompting a pretrained LM. We then prompt the same LM for answer prediction using the generated context and the question. Additionally, to eliminate failure caused by context uncertainty, we marginalize over generated contexts. Experimental results on three QA benchmarks show that our method significantly outperforms previous closed-book QA methods (e.g. exact matching 68.6% vs. 55.3%), and is on par with open-book methods that exploit external knowledge sources (e.g. 68.6% vs. 68.0%). Our method is able to better exploit the stored knowledge in pretrained LMs without adding extra learnable parameters or needing finetuning, and paves the way for hybrid models that integrate pretrained LMs with external knowledge.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.06349v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Context Generation Improves Open Domain Question Answering" addresses the challenge of closed-book question answering (QA) by proposing a two-stage framework that effectively exploits stored knowledge in pretrained language models (LMs). The proposed approach utilizes a coarse-to-fine approach to extract relevant knowledge and provide answers, overcoming the limitations of previous methods. Experimental results on three QA benchmarks demonstrate significant improvement over previous closed-book QA methods, achieving an exact matching accuracy of 68.6%. This method also performs on par with open-book methods that utilize external knowledge sources, showcasing its potential for hybrid models. The paper was authored by Dan Su, Mostofa Patwary, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Peng Xu, Ryan Prenger, Mohammad Shoeybi, Pascale Fung, Anima Anandkumar, and Bryan Catanzaro and has been accepted at EACL2023 conference.
Created on 08 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.