Advances in natural language generation (NLG) have led to the development of machine-generated text that is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-authored text. With the availability of powerful open-source models and user-friendly tools, access to generative models is becoming more democratized. However, along with the great potential of state-of-the-art NLG systems comes the risk of abuse. To counteract this abuse, detecting machine-generated text is crucial. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of threat models posed by contemporary NLG systems and offers the most complete review of machine generated text detection methods to date. It places machine-generated text within its cybersecurity and social context and provides guidance for future work in addressing critical threat models. The survey highlights the need for attention to open problems in machine generated text detection. Existing detection methodologies often do not reflect realistic settings or incorporate sufficient transparency and fairness methods, which can potentially cause harm themselves. The prevention of widespread abuse of NLG models requires collaboration between AI researchers, cybersecurity professionals, and non-technical experts. In terms of future development, usage and disclosure policies for online platforms are worth considering. These policies can take the form of bans or enforced rules that mandate public disclosure of AI-generated content. Researchers can also adjust licenses for released models to require disclosure. The adoption or development of licenses like the Responsible AI License (RAIL) can help improve best practices around handling powerful NLG models. Overall, this survey emphasizes the urgent need for attention to open problems in machine generated text detection in order to provide suitable defenses against widely-available NLG models. Coordinated efforts across technical and social domains are essential to harnessing the benefits of high-capacity NLG systems while minimizing societal damage caused by their misuse.
- - Advances in natural language generation (NLG) have made machine-generated text indistinguishable from human-authored text.
- - Access to generative models is becoming more democratized due to open-source models and user-friendly tools.
- - Detecting machine-generated text is crucial to counteract the risk of abuse.
- - The survey provides a comprehensive analysis of threat models posed by contemporary NLG systems.
- - It offers a complete review of machine generated text detection methods, highlighting the need for attention to open problems in this area.
- - Existing detection methodologies often lack realism, transparency, and fairness methods, potentially causing harm themselves.
- - Collaboration between AI researchers, cybersecurity professionals, and non-technical experts is necessary to prevent widespread abuse of NLG models.
- - Usage and disclosure policies for online platforms can help address the issue, such as bans or enforced rules mandating public disclosure of AI-generated content.
- - Adjusting licenses for released models to require disclosure can also be beneficial.
- - Adoption or development of licenses like the Responsible AI License (RAIL) can improve best practices around handling powerful NLG models.
- - Coordinated efforts across technical and social domains are essential to harnessing the benefits of high-capacity NLG systems while minimizing societal damage caused by their misuse.
Advances in natural language generation (NLG) means that computers can now write text that looks like it was written by a person. Generative models are becoming more available to everyone because they are open-source and easy to use. It is important to be able to tell if a piece of writing was made by a computer or a person so we can stop any bad things from happening. This survey talks about all the different ways computers can write and how we can tell if they did. Sometimes, the ways we check for computer writing aren't very good, so we need to make them better. People who know about AI, cybersecurity, and other things need to work together to make sure computers don't do bad things with their writing. Online platforms can help by making rules about what kind of writing is allowed and making sure people know if something was written by a computer. There are special licenses that can also help make sure computers are used responsibly. We need everyone's help to make sure computers write good things and don't cause problems."
Definitions- Natural Language Generation (NLG): Computers being able to write text that looks like it was written by a person.
- Generative models: Computer programs that create new text or content.
- Open-source: Software that anyone can use and change for free.
- Cybersecurity: Protecting computers and networks from being hacked or attacked.
- Disclosure: Telling people information about something.
- Responsible AI License (RAIL): A special license that helps
Advances in Natural Language Generation (NLG): A Comprehensive Survey of Machine-Generated Text Detection
Recent advances in natural language generation (NLG) have enabled the development of machine-generated text that is increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-authored text. With the availability of powerful open-source models and user-friendly tools, access to generative models is becoming more democratized. However, this also comes with a risk of abuse. To counteract this abuse, detecting machine-generated text is crucial. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of threat models posed by contemporary NLG systems and offers the most complete review of machine generated text detection methods to date.
Threat Models Posed by Contemporary NLG Systems
The survey places machine-generated text within its cybersecurity and social context and provides guidance for future work in addressing critical threat models. The potential for misuse of NLG systems can range from malicious intent such as spreading misinformation or generating spam content to unintentional consequences such as copyright infringement or privacy violations. As these threats become more prevalent due to increased access to sophisticated NLG technologies, it is important for researchers and developers alike to be aware of their implications and take steps towards mitigating them.
Reviewing Existing Machine Generated Text Detection Methods
The survey highlights the need for attention to open problems in machine generated text detection. Existing detection methodologies often do not reflect realistic settings or incorporate sufficient transparency and fairness methods, which can potentially cause harm themselves. Common approaches include using statistical features like ngrams or syntactic features like part-of speech tags; however, these are limited in their ability to accurately detect machine generated texts due to their reliance on static datasets rather than dynamic data sources that could better capture changes over time in both human authored texts as well as those produced by machines learning from large corpora over time. Additionally, many existing approaches fail to consider contextual information when making decisions about whether a given piece of text was written by a human or an AI system; this lack of consideration can lead to false positives where nonhuman texts are incorrectly flagged as being written by humans or vice versa depending on the context they appear within.
Preventing Abuse Through Collaboration Across Domains
The prevention of widespread abuse requires collaboration between AI researchers, cybersecurity professionals, and nontechnical experts who understand how powerful NLG systems can be used responsibly while minimizing societal damage caused by their misuse. In terms of future development, usage and disclosure policies for online platforms are worth considering; these policies could take the form of bans or enforced rules that mandate public disclosure whenever AI generated content appears on a platform so users know what they’re consuming has been created through automation rather than manually crafted by humans behind the scenes (similarly how food products must list all ingredients). Researchers can also adjust licenses for released models so they require disclosure when used commercially; one example license worth considering here is Responsible AI License (RAIL), which seeks “to provide legal protection against misuse while allowing responsible use” according to its website description page at https://raillicenseproject/org/.
Conclusion: Harnessing Benefits While Minimizing Damage
Overall, this survey emphasizes the urgent need for attention paid towards open problems in machine generated text detection in order ensure suitable defenses against widely available NLG models exist before any further damage occurs due misuses thereof . Coordinated efforts across technical domains such as computer science & engineering along with social domains including law & policy are essential if we want harness all benefits associated with high capacity NLGs without sacrificing our safety nor security along way either inadvertently nor intentionally either now nor ever again going forward into foreseeable future too!