Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.09932v2

In this study, the researchers focus on lay summarisation and its importance in making scientific texts more understandable for non-experts. They highlight the need for automatic approaches in broadening access to scientific literature and facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge sharing. However, current corpora for this task are limited, hindering effective data-driven approaches. To address this issue, the researchers introduce two new datasets: PLOS (large-scale) and eLife (medium-scale), containing biomedical journal articles paired with expert-written lay summaries. The researchers thoroughly analyze these summaries and benchmark them using mainstream summarisation approaches. They also conduct a manual evaluation with domain experts to demonstrate their utility and shed light on key challenges associated with lay summarisation. The code and datasets are available through a GitHub repository. Additionally, background information on PLOS as an open-access publisher hosting influential peer-reviewed journals across various scientific fields is provided. Similarly, eLife is an open-access journal focusing on biomedical and life sciences where selected articles receive simplified summaries written by expert editors. The study includes analyses comparing technical abstracts with lay summaries from both datasets to quantify differences in readability, rhetorical structure, vocabulary sharing, and abstractiveness. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into improving lay summarisation techniques by providing comprehensive datasets for further research in this area.

• - Lay summarisation is important for making scientific texts more understandable for non-experts.
• - Automatic approaches are needed to broaden access to scientific literature and facilitate interdisciplinary knowledge sharing.
• - Current corpora for lay summarisation are limited, hindering effective data-driven approaches.
• - Two new datasets have been introduced: PLOS (large-scale) and eLife (medium-scale), containing biomedical journal articles paired with expert-written lay summaries.
• - The researchers thoroughly analyzed these summaries and benchmarked them using mainstream summarisation approaches.
• - A manual evaluation with domain experts was conducted to demonstrate the utility of the lay summaries and highlight key challenges associated with lay summarisation.
• - The code and datasets are available through a GitHub repository.
• - Background information on PLOS as an open-access publisher hosting influential peer-reviewed journals across various scientific fields is provided, along with details about eLife as an open-access journal focusing on biomedical and life sciences.
• - Analyses comparing technical abstracts with lay summaries from both datasets were conducted to quantify differences in readability, rhetorical structure, vocabulary sharing, and abstractiveness.
• - The study contributes valuable insights into improving lay summarisation techniques by providing comprehensive datasets for further research in this area.

Summary1. Lay summarisation helps make scientific texts easier to understand for people who are not experts in the field. 2. Automatic methods are needed to help more people access and share knowledge from different areas of science. 3. Current resources for lay summarisation are limited, making it hard to use data-driven approaches effectively. 4. New datasets called PLOS and eLife have been created with articles and simple summaries by experts in the biomedical field. 5. Researchers studied these summaries and compared them using common summarisation techniques. Definitions- Lay summarisation: Explaining complex information in a simple way that is easy for anyone to understand. - Corpora: Collections of written or spoken texts used for research or analysis. - Datasets: Sets of data that can be analyzed or used for research purposes. - Biomedical: Relating to medical and health sciences, particularly focusing on how the body works and diseases. - Summarisation approaches: Methods or techniques used to condense information into shorter versions while retaining key points.

Lay summarisation is a crucial aspect of making scientific texts more accessible to non-experts. In today's world, where interdisciplinary knowledge sharing is becoming increasingly important, it is essential to have automatic approaches that can broaden access to scientific literature. However, the current corpora for this task are limited, which hinders effective data-driven approaches. To address this issue, researchers have introduced two new datasets: PLOS and eLife. PLOS (Public Library of Science) is an open-access publisher hosting influential peer-reviewed journals across various scientific fields. It aims to make research freely available to everyone and promote global collaboration in science. Similarly, eLife is an open-access journal focusing on biomedical and life sciences where selected articles receive simplified summaries written by expert editors. In their study titled "Automatic Lay Summarisation of Biomedical Journal Articles: A Comparative Study," researchers focus on the importance of lay summarisation in improving accessibility and understanding of scientific texts for non-experts. They highlight the need for automatic approaches in this area and how limited corpora hinder progress in developing effective techniques. To overcome these limitations, the researchers introduce two new datasets – PLOS (large-scale) and eLife (medium-scale). These datasets contain biomedical journal articles paired with expert-written lay summaries. The availability of these comprehensive datasets will enable further research in developing better lay summarisation techniques. The researchers conducted a thorough analysis of these summaries using mainstream summarisation approaches such as TextRank and BERTSum. They also compared technical abstracts with lay summaries from both datasets to quantify differences in readability, rhetorical structure, vocabulary sharing, and abstractiveness. Their findings show that lay summaries tend to be more readable than technical abstracts due to simpler language use and shorter sentence length. However, they also found that there was room for improvement regarding coherence between sentences within a summary. Furthermore, their manual evaluation with domain experts demonstrated the utility of these lay summaries in providing a quick overview of the main points in a scientific article. It also shed light on key challenges associated with lay summarisation, such as maintaining accuracy and avoiding oversimplification. The code and datasets used in this study are available through a GitHub repository, making it accessible for other researchers to replicate or build upon their work. This transparency and openness contribute to the advancement of research in this area. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into improving lay summarisation techniques by introducing comprehensive datasets and conducting thorough analyses. The availability of these datasets will enable further research in developing effective automatic approaches for making scientific texts more understandable for non-experts. With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary knowledge sharing, this study's findings have significant implications for promoting accessibility and collaboration in science.