The merger and assembly histories of Milky Way- and M31-like galaxies with TNG50: disk survival through mergers
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper analyzes the merger and assembly histories of Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31)-like galaxies using the TNG50 simulation.
- The goal is to determine how often disk galaxies of this mass can survive recent major mergers with a stellar mass ratio greater than or equal to 1:4.
- 198 analog galaxies in TNG50 were identified based on their $z=0$ stellar mass ($10^{10.5-11.2} {\rm M_{\odot}}$), disky stellar morphology, and local environment.
- Major mergers are common, with 85% (168) of MW/M31-like galaxies in TNG50 having undergone at least one major merger across their lifetime, and 16% having undergone a recent major merger within the last 5 Gyr.
- Higher merger mass ratios are more likely to destroy the stellar disks, but roughly half of the cases result in the pre-existing stellar disk being destroyed but reforming thanks to star formation.
- MW/M31-like galaxies with recent major mergers have somewhat thicker stellar disks, more massive and somewhat shallower stellar haloes, larger ex-situ mass fractions but similarly massive kinematically-defined bulges compared to those with more ancient massive mergers.
- A recent quiet merger history is not necessary for obtaining a relatively thin stellar disk at $z=0$.
- These findings are consistent with observed properties of the Galaxy and Andromeda as well as constraints on their most recent major mergers.
Authors: Diego Sotillo-Ramos, Annalisa Pillepich, Martina Donnari, Dylan Nelson, Lukas Eisert, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Gandhali Joshi, Mark Vogelsberger, Lars Hernquist
Abstract: We analyze the merger and assembly histories of Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31)-like galaxies to quantify how, and how often, disk galaxies of this mass can survive recent major mergers (stellar mass ratio $\ge$ 1:4). For this, we use the cosmological magneto-hydrodynamical simulation TNG50 and identify 198 analog galaxies, selected based on their $z=0$ stellar mass ($10^{10.5-11.2} {\rm M_{\odot}}$), disky stellar morphology and local environment. Firstly, major mergers are common: 85 per cent (168) of MW/M31-like galaxies in TNG50 have undergone at least one major merger across their lifetime. In fact, 31 galaxies (16 per cent) have undergone a recent major merger, i.e. in the last 5 Gyr. The gas available during the merger suffices to either induce starbursts at pericentric passages or to sustain prolonged star formation after coalescence: in roughly half of the cases, the pre-existing stellar disk is destroyed because of the merger but reforms thanks to star formation. Moreover, higher merger mass ratios are more likely to destroy the stellar disks. In comparison to those with more ancient massive mergers, MW/M31-like galaxies with recent major mergers have, on average, somewhat thicker stellar disks, more massive and somewhat shallower stellar haloes, larger stellar ex-situ mass fractions, but similarly massive kinematically-defined bulges. All this is qualitatively consistent with the different observed properties of the Galaxy and Andromeda and with the constraints on their most recent major mergers, 8-11 and ~2 Gyr ago, respectively. According to contemporary cosmological simulations, a recent quiet merger history is not a pre-requisite for obtaining a relatively-thin stellar disk at $z=0$.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 1
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.